Like an increasing number of visitors to Nepal, 26-year-old Marina Argeisa wanted to experience the latest must-do activity on the tourist trail: volunteering at an orphanage.
The Spaniard paid US$480 to spend four weeks in a home. She did not know many of the children had living parents who had paid large sums to a broker to have them “educated” — and that by volunteering she was supporting an industry that exploits poor families and well-meaning foreigners.
“Once a child enters an orphanage, he or she seems to become the property of the orphanage owner ... [In effect], they become prisoners of the orphanage,” said Philip Holmes of the charity Freedom Matters. “[The owners] use the children as an income source, through the sponsorship of children who are presented as being orphans when they are not ... and through the exploitation of overseas volunteers.”
Campaigners say that in the worst cases, tourists may be unwittingly complicit in child trafficking.
“Voluntourism” is rapidly expanding in Nepal, with dozens of agencies offering the chance to spend weeks, or months, at one of the 800 registered orphanages. Activists say there are also numerous unregistered homes.
However, some of the homes are not all they seem. An investigation by UNICEF, the UN’s children agency, found 85 percent of children in the orphanages they visited had at least one living parent.
The trade in children begins in Nepal’s countryside, where parents are lured into sending their children to orphanages, often by the promise of an education.
Lojung Sherpa sent three children to the Happy Home orphanage in Kathmandu after she was told foreigners would educate them and raise money for one of her daughters, who has a serious medical condition. Some time later her daughter told her all donations toward her treatment had been taken by the orphanage owner.
Sherpa went to Kathmandu to retrieve her children from the home, but was turned away. After an investigation, the orphanage owner was arrested on charges of child abduction and fraud. Sherpa’s children were later found at locations across the city.
Dorota Nvotova, a Slovakian, began volunteering at Happy Home in 2008, and was so moved by the children’s plight that she found sponsors for them all.
She raised about 150,000 euros (US$205,000), but later discovered the real reason its owner was so eager for volunteers.
“It’s definitely about him making money,” she said. “Whenever volunteers came he always tried to impress them and then they started fund-raising for him.”
Argeisa was volunteering at a different Kathmandu orphanage when a child told her she had been sexually abused by the owner.
Argeisa reported the allegations to a children’s organization, Action for Child Rights (ACR), and the owner was arrested on suspicion of attempted rape.
“The foreigners do not realize what is happening because they [the owners] are specialists in stopping people from seeing the dark side,” she said. “There are many people living for six months in an orphanage and they don’t realize this, because these children are scared... These houses are jails for these children.”
This is not an exceptional case, says Jurgen Conings of ACR, who has spent 10 years in Nepal investigating the nexus between foreigners, adoption agencies and orphanages.
“I’m 100 percent sure the majority of these homes are built for reasons other than childcare,” he said. “Foreign volunteers give a home credibility ... and they pay to volunteer, so it’s a strong business model.”
Martin Punaks, of Next Generation Nepal, which reunites trafficked children with their families, says voluntourism is a growing industry.
“There is the potential for huge profits to be made for those who intentionally and unnecessarily displace children from their families so they can be used as lucrative poverty commodities to raise funds from well-intentioned, but ill-informed tourists,” he said.
The government is struggling to cope.
“These children are a showpiece, but no one knows how much the owner gets and how much goes to the children,” said Tarak Dhital, executive director of the Central Child Welfare Board (CCWB), which regulates orphanages in Nepal.
“We have introduced minimum standards for children’s homes and we need to strengthen our monitoring systems, but ... we lack financial and human resources,” Dhital said.
CCWB’s latest report said 90 percent of children’s homes failed to meet minimum operating standards.
Conings cautioned against the blanket condemnation of orphanages.
“A lot of good things are done; a lot of NGOs and social workers are doing an amazing job,” he said. “We would never say it’s not good [to volunteer], but we want to bring this to the public’s attention.”
Some of the names in this article have been changed.
ACTIONABLE ADVICE: The majority of chatbots tested provided guidance on weapons, tactics and target selections, with Perplexity and Meta AI deemed to be the least safe From school shootings to synagogue bombings, leading artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots helped researchers plot violent attacks, according to a study published on Wednesday that highlighted the technology’s potential for real-world harm. Researchers from the nonprofit watchdog Center for Countering Digital Hate and CNN posed as 13-year-old boys in the US and Ireland to test 10 chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Deepseek and Meta AI. Eight of the chatbots assisted the make-believe attackers in more than half the responses, providing advice on “locations to target” and “weapons to use” in an attack, the study said. The chatbots had become a “powerful accelerant for
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Since the war in the Middle East began nearly two weeks ago, the telephone at Ron Hubbard’s bomb shelter company in Texas has not stopped ringing. Foreign and US clients are rushing to buy his bunkers, seeking refuge in case of air raids, nuclear fallout or apocalypse. With the US and Israel pounding Iran, and Tehran retaliating with strikes across the region, Hubbard has seen demand for his product soar, mostly from Gulf nation customers in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. “You can imagine how many people are thinking: ‘I wish I had a bomb shelter,’” Hubbard, 63, said in
STILL IN POWER: US intelligence reports showed that the Iranian regime is not in danger of collapse and retains control of the public, casting doubt on Trump’s exit Nearly every US Senate Democrat on Wednesday signed a letter sent to US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth requesting a “swift investigation” of airstrikes on a girls’ school in Iran that killed scores of children and any other potential US military actions causing civilian harm. Reuters reported on Thursday last week that US military investigators believe it is likely that US forces were responsible for the Feb. 28 strike on the school, as US and Israeli forces launched attacks on Iran. “The results of this school attack are horrific. The majority of those killed in the strikes were girls between the ages