Spain is resisting probing the forced disappearance of thousands of people during its 1936 to 1939 Civil War and the dictatorship of former Spanish general Francisco Franco that followed despite a UN call for it to act.
During the past 13 years about 6,300 bodies have been exhumed from mass graves of which 2,500 have been identified, according to Emilio Silva, who heads the Association for the Recovery of Historical Memory, which spearheads efforts to help people find the remains of relatives who went missing during the Spanish Civil War.
“But the criminal justice system did not take action in any of these cases,” he said.
Five years ago, 36 civic associations filed hundreds of complaints regarding the murder and disappearance of 114,000 people during Spain’s civil war, and the early years of the dictatorship that followed, with crusading human rights judge Baltasar Garzon.
Garzon opened an investigation, but under pressure from public prosecutors in 2010 passed jurisdiction down to regional courts before being tried for abuse of power for violating an amnesty agreed in 1977 as Spain moved toward democracy two years after Franco’s death by opening the probe.
“Since then courts have shelved the complaints without carrying out any type of investigation,” said Esteban Beltran, the director of Amnesty International’s branch in Spain.
The amnesty law, which was approved by parliament, covers all crimes of a political nature committed before 1977 “whatever their outcome.”
That stance was seen as a necessity by the leaders tasked with unifying the country still smarting from the wounds of the civil war and dictatorship and to protect officials from score-settling.
Unable to seek justice in Spain, about 50 Spaniards have brought charges in Argentina for crimes against humanity against four policemen they say tortured them during the Franco era.
Argentine federal judge Maria Servini de Cubria has agreed to hear the case under the doctrine of “universal jurisdiction” which allows courts to try cases of human rights abuses committed in other countries.
Last month she issued arrest and extradition orders for the four policemen, two of whom are alive and living in Spain.
“When the doors were closed here, we thought of the principle of universal jurisdiction and we turned to Argentina,” said Silva, whose grandfather was shot by Franco’s forces in 1936 near Leon in northwestern Spain.
However, the Spanish government has not cooperated with the Argentine investigation.
Three weeks after she issued her arrest and extradition orders, the two policeman remain at large.
Daily newspaper El Mundo published a photograph on Sunday last week of one of the two, 67-year-old Juan Antonio Gonzalez, who it described as “the most feared inspector of Franco’s political police,” as he took part in a recent marathon in Madrid.
Nearly four decades after Spain’s amnesty law was passed, both the ruling conservative Popular Party and the main opposition Socialist Party, reject repealing the amnesty.
“We do not back changing that commitment which established a political agreement to not make mutual recriminations about the past,” said former Socialist Cabinet minister Ramon Juaregui, who warned of the “danger or returning the country to a fratricidal controversy.”
The UN, which sent a working group to Spain to see how the country was investigating Franco-era disappearances, last month urged Madrid to overturn the amnesty.
“The amnesty can’t serve as a barrier to the investigation of serious human rights violations,” said Ariel Dulitzky, a member of the UN working group which spent a week in Spain interviewing family members of those who disappeared.
Garzon, who was disbarred as a judge by Spain’s Supreme Court last year for illegally recording defense lawyers’ conversations with clients, argued international laws against the worst human rights violations should trump the national amnesty.
The Popular Party, which traces its origines to the Popular Alliance, a union of seven conservative political parties formed in the 1970s by Manuel Fraga, a longtime Cabinet member under Franco, is reluctant to act because of its historical ties to the dictatorship, said Fermin Bouza, a sociologist at Madrid’s Complutense University.
“The government is of the right and it is a government that comes from that regime, in that sense it is normal that they have that reluctance,” he said.
Spanish Minister of Justice Alberto Ruiz Gallardon, whose father-in-law was a Cabinet minister in the Franco regime, recently defended the amnesty law in parliament, calling it “the only consistent policy that can end this past of civil war and crusades.”
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the