The mothers of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman told jurors in a Florida courtroom on Friday that they both recognized the screams for help heard moments before Zimmerman shot and killed Martin as coming from their respective sons.
The dueling accounts came as Seminole County Judge Debra Nelson denied a defense request to throw out the highly publicized second-degree murder case against Zimmerman.
She ruled that the jury should decide whether to convict the neighborhood watch volunteer, who contends that he killed the unarmed black teenager in self-defense.
Photo: Reuters
Zimmerman’s defense lawyer had asked for the dismissal once prosecutors rested their “so-called case in chief,” arguing that prosecutors had failed to prove a case based “at least 98 percent [on] circumstantial evidence.”
However, prosecutors countered that Zimmerman offered at least three different explanations for how his confrontation with Martin began, casting doubt on his claim of self-defense.
“There are two people involved here. One of them’s dead. One of them’s a liar,” prosecutor Richard Mantei said.
Nelson denied the defense motion immediately after arguments, and the defense then began its case.
Zimmerman, 29, killed Martin, 17, in the central Florida town of Sanford on Feb. 26 last year.
Police initially declined to arrest Zimmerman, believing his claim of self-defense. However, that ignited protests and cries of injustice in Sanford and major cities across the US, as the case came to reflect what many see as unequal treatment of African Americans before the law.
A special prosecutor later brought the charge of second-degree murder, after Zimmerman walked free following the killing for 45 days.
Early on Friday, Martin’s mother, Sybrina Fulton, testified that she “absolutely” recognized the voice of her son screaming in the background of an emergency call made to police moments before he died.
“I heard my son screaming,” Fulton said.
However, the defense later called Zimmerman’s mother, Peruvian-born Gladys Zimmerman, as its first witness and she too said it was her son crying for help.
Asked by lead defense attorney Mark O’Mara how she could be certain, she responded: “Because he’s my son.”
Testimony from voice-recognition experts has been ruled inadmissible in the trial on the grounds that it was impossible to tell from the brief, poor-quality recording whether it was Martin or Zimmerman.
Testimony from the mothers certainly seem to underscore reasonable doubt about whose voice really cried out for help on the 911 police emergency tape. However, it could also prompt the six women jurors to make a Solomonic decision about which mother appears to be lying.
If the bone-chilling screams came from Martin, as his older brother also testified on Friday, the slain 17-year-old could hardly be the aggressor who Zimmerman claims he could only fight off with a hollow point bullet from his 9mm handgun.
O’Mara, in a rare moment of neutrality outside the courtroom, told reporters that both mothers may believe they hear their sons screaming on the 911 emergency tape from police.
“We have to treat them as the grieving parents they are in different ways,” he said.
In other testimony on Friday, prosecutors called Shiping Bao, the central Florida medical examiner who performed the autopsy on Martin.
Bao said Martin did not die instantly, even though the lone bullet from Zimmerman’s semi-automatic handgun pierced the right ventricle of his heart.
“It is my opinion that he was still alive, he was still in pain, he was still suffering,” said Bao, even as he said Martin could not possibly have survived the wound.
“I believe that he was alive for one to 10 minutes after he was shot,” Bao added.
Bao’s testimony was accompanied by graphic photographs from the autopsy that were shown to jurors. He did not explain how Martin could have been in pain, if he lost consciousness before he died, and acknowledged that he previously said the youth may only have lived for up to three minutes after the shooting.
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the