With room for maneuver slipping away, top US Republican Representative John Boehner is in a bind over how to avoid going over the “fiscal cliff”: Embrace higher taxes and earn conservatives’ ire or scupper a deal and incur Americans’ wrath.
Another option, one that few non-partisans see as very viable, is for US President Barack Obama to cave in and agree to Republican demands not to raise taxes, even for the wealthiest people in the US.
A likelier resolution is a compromise with the White House that avoids the shock next month of automatic spending cuts coupled with tax hikes on nearly all people in the US, while laying out enough deficit reduction that eases concern about the country’s financial well-being.
In the game of political chicken to see whether Democrats or Republicans blink first, perhaps the trickiest role of all rests with Speaker of the House Boehner, who along with Obama is the principal in the negotiations.
Boehner’s guidance of the Republican position in coming days and weeks could signal much about party direction in the wake of an election that saw flag bearer Mitt Romney — who advocated slashing tax rates across the board — defeated by Obama.
“To say Boehner is between a rock and a hard place is minimizing the problem he faces,” Boston University professor and longtime political consultant Tobe Berkovitz told reporters.
“Boehner is trying to keep public opinion about Republicans from totally cratering, and at the same time keep the Tea Party hardcore conservatives from totally abandoning the party,” he said.
Conservative Republican Representative Trent Franks agrees that “our speaker is in an enormously difficult position.”
“And I think he’s doing the best he can,” the congressman told National Public Radio. “That doesn’t mean that what he finally arrives at will be something that I can support or it won’t. You know, I don’t know.”
Few people other than Boehner and Obama know the true state of negotiations in what appears as a well-choreographed campaign to thrash out a last-minute deal.
Discussions appear to have stalled, though, and Boehner has accused Obama of having “wasted another week” by not pushing talks forward.
Over the weekend Boehner “will be waiting for the White House to respond to our serious offer about averting the fiscal cliff,” his spokesman Michael Steel told reporters.
Obama has proposed US$1.6 trillion in new taxes over the next decade from higher rates on the wealthiest 2 percent of people in the US.
Republicans countered with a plan for US$800 billion in tax revenue raised by closing loopholes and ending some deductions. Both plans were rejected.
A Democratic official said on Saturday that “nothing has changed since yesterday.”
Polls show most people in the US want to see taxes rise on the wealthy.
With Obama winning re-election on Nov. 6, and his Democrats gaining seats in both the House of Representatives and Senate, Republicans concede privately — and some publicly — that the Democrats have the upper hand.
“President Obama pretty well holds all the cards in this negotiation,” Republican Senator Ron Johnson told Fox News. “If he wants to have tax increases or tax rates go up, I don’t see how Republicans can stop him.”
Public trust is not in Boehner’s favor. A Washington Post/Pew poll last week showed 53 percent of people in the US would blame Republicans should the economy dive off the cliff; 27 percent would blame Democrats.
In his weekly address on Saturday, Obama said he was willing to find ways to reduce health costs and make more entitlement spending cuts, but as for asking “the wealthiest Americans to pay higher tax rates — that’s one principle I won’t compromise on.”
Potential future Republican leaders like Senator Marco Rubio are unlikely to want to bend to White House will.
Rubio, a possible 2016 presidential candidate, gave the Republican response to Obama’s address — and said “tax increases will not solve our US$16 trillion debt.”
Boehner has said that, too, but his position is tenuous. On Friday he left open the possibility for compromise on a tax rate rise.
In past negotiations, such as last December’s battle over extending the payroll tax holiday, some Republicans felt Boehner gave away too much.
Hashtags on Twitter — #boehnermustgo, #fireboehner — have recently left little doubt that some Republicans are fed up with his handling of the talks.
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the