Fed by diplomatic tensions and election-year politics, talk about a coming conflict with Iran has reached a fever pitch in the US capital.
Speculation of a possible war with Iran ebbs and flows, but a confluence of events has served to fuel dire predictions among politicians and pundits that war may be on the horizon — either by necessity or by accident.
Some of the same hawkish voices that portrayed former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein’s regime as a dire threat requiring urgent military action are now warning that the US must be prepared for war with Iran, while accusing US President Barack Obama of lacking backbone.
John Yoo, a former US Justice Department official under former US president George W. Bush, has called on Republican presidential candidates to “begin preparing the case for a military strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.”
Calling it an “unavoidable challenge,” Yoo wrote last week in the National Review that the US would have legal grounds to strike at Iran’s nuclear sites — similar to the arguments made before the invasion of Iraq.
“It can argue that destroying Iran’s nuclear weapons is a combination of self-defense and protecting international security,” said Yoo, who during Bush’s tenure backed broad presidential powers to wage war and deny rights to terror suspects.
Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has made a clear commitment to use military force if necessary, promising that if he wins the White House, Iran will not have nuclear weapons.
Both in the US and Israel, lawmakers and commentators warn that time is running out on the Iranian “nuclear clock” and that at some point over the next year, economic sanctions will have to be abandoned in favor of bombing raids to stop Iran from securing the bomb.
US Senator Lindsey Graham and other Republicans have said any US military action would have to be broader than a few “surgical” strikes on nuclear facilities.
“Their capability is so redundant you’d have to do more than go after the nuclear program, you have to neuter this regime, destroy the air force, sink their navy, go after the Revolution Guard and try to get people in the country to overthrow the regime. We need a regime change,” Graham told the CBS show Face the Nation in November.
“If they get a nuclear weapon, the world is going to go into darkness,” he said.
Despite rising tensions with Tehran and tough rhetoric from lawmakers, US military and defense chiefs have repeatedly said air strikes on Iran would, at best, only delay Tehran’s nuclear efforts by a few years while carrying huge risks.
Analysts who oppose military action worry the US could stumble into a war with Iran because a strategy focused on pressure and punitive sanctions may leave no diplomatic way out of the crisis.
“We are in such an escalatory cycle, if we just continue on this path much longer, we will essentially sleepwalk into a war,” said Trita Parsi, author of a book on US policy toward Iran
In A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran, Parsi argues the Obama administration tried a diplomatic approach, but gave up too soon, partly because the Iranian regime’s crackdown on street protests in 2009 made it politically impossible for the White House to pursue an opening with Tehran.
“It made a bad atmosphere much, much worse,” said Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council.
Obama faces similar political pressures that plagued former US president Bill Clinton over Iraq in the 1990s, when Republicans blasted sanctions on Saddam Hussein as ineffective, according to Parsi.
Some US officials privately worry about sliding into an unintended war, as does Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former national security advisor for former US president Jimmy Carter in the 1970s.
“We think we are going to avoid war by moving towards compulsion,” Brzezinski said last month. “But the more you lean towards compulsion, the more the choice becomes war if it doesn’t work. That narrows our options in a very dramatic way.”
Shortly before retiring, the former top-ranking US officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, worried a lack of communication between the two countries’ militaries could turn an incident into a potential conflict.
“We are not talking to Iran. So we don’t understand each other,” Mullen said in September. “If something happens, it’s virtually assured that we won’t get it right, that there will be miscalculations.”
CONFRONTATION: The water cannon attack was the second this month on the Philippine supply boat ‘Unaizah May 4,’ after an incident on March 5 The China Coast Guard yesterday morning blocked a Philippine supply vessel and damaged it with water cannons near a reef off the Southeast Asian country, the Philippines said. The Philippine military released video of what it said was a nearly hour-long attack off the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙) in the contested South China Sea, where Chinese ships have unleashed water cannons and collided with Philippine vessels in similar standoffs in the past few months. The China Coast Guard and other vessels “once again harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers” against a routine rotation and resupply mission to
GLOBAL COMBAT AIR PROGRAM: The potential purchasers would be limited to the 15 nations with which Tokyo has signed defense partnership and equipment transfer deals Japan’s Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to sell future next-generation fighter jets that it is developing with the UK and Italy to other nations, in the latest move away from the country’s post-World War II pacifist principles. The contentious decision to allow international arms sales is expected to help secure Japan’s role in the joint fighter jet project, and is part of a move to build up the Japanese arms industry and bolster its role in global security. The Cabinet also endorsed a revision to Japan’s arms equipment and technology transfer guidelines to allow coproduced lethal weapons to be sold to nations
‘POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE’: Leo Varadkar said he was ‘no longer the best person’ to lead the nation and was stepping down for political, as well as personal, reasons Leo Varadkar on Wednesday announced that he was stepping down as Ireland’s prime minister and leader of the Fine Gael party in the governing coalition, citing “personal and political” reasons. Pundits called the surprise move, just 10 weeks before Ireland holds European Parliament and local elections, a “political earthquake.” A general election has to be held within a year. Irish Deputy Prime Minister Micheal Martin, leader of Fianna Fail, the main coalition partner, said Varadkar’s announcement was “unexpected,” but added that he expected the government to run its full term. An emotional Varadkar, who is in his second stint as prime minister and at
Thousands of devotees, some in a state of trance, gathered at a Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bangkok renowned for sacred tattoos known as Sak Yant, paying their respects to a revered monk who mastered the practice and seeking purification. The gathering at Wat Bang Phra Buddhist temple is part of a Thai Wai Khru ritual in which devotees pay homage to Luang Phor Pern, the temple’s formal abbot, who died in 2002. He had a reputation for refining and popularizing the temple’s Sak Yant tattoo style. The idea that tattoos confer magical powers has existed in many parts of Asia