Wed, Apr 21, 2010 page6

• Egypt seeks pressure on nuclear Israel

  UNDER DISCUSSION The administration of US President Barack Obama is mulling support for a conference on creating a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East

  • REUTERS
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Israel may come under new pressure next month at a UN meeting on atomic weapons as the US, Britain and France consider backing Egypt’s call for a zone in the Middle East free of nuclear arms, envoys said.

  The 189 signatories to the 1970 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) will meet at UN headquarters in New York for a May 3 to May 28 conference on the troubled pact, the credibility of which analysts say has been undermined by the atomic programs of Iran and North Korea and the failure of the big nuclear powers to disarm.

  Israel, like India and Pakistan, never signed the treaty and is not officially attending the conference. The Jewish state is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal, although it has never confirmed or denied having atomic weapons.

  The NPT review conferences take place every five years. At the 1995 meeting, member states unanimously supported a resolution backing the idea of “a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons as well as other weapons of mass destruction.”

  In a working paper Egypt submitted to fellow treaty members ahead of next month’s meeting, Cairo said the conference should formally express regret that “no progress has taken place on the implementation of the [1995] resolution” and call for an international treaty conference by 2011.

  The point of such a conference would be “to launch negotiations, with the participation of all states of the Middle East, on an internationally and effectively verifiable treaty for the establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East,” the Egyptian paper said.

  Egyptian initiatives at NPT meetings are nothing new, but Western diplomats familiar with the issue said the five permanent UN. Security Council members — the US, Britain, France, China and Russia — might be ready to support such a conference, although not with a negotiating mandate.

  Diplomats said the three Western powers might also encourage Israel to participate, although their position was that there could be no mandate for negotiating such a treaty now, when many countries in the region refuse to recognize Israel.

  Backing from the five permanent Security Council members — the NPT’s five official nuclear powers — would help ensure broad support for Egypt’s plan next month.

  One Western envoy said Egypt’s insistence on a conference with a negotiating mandate was the main “sticking point,” while another expressed the hope that Egypt would compromise during intensive negotiations on the issue in the coming weeks.

  But Egypt’s UN Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz said the real sticking point was Israel’s reluctance to participate.

  “We want the Israelis to sit at a table and negotiate,” he said.

  “We’re flexible on the location and the format of the conference,” Abdelaziz said, adding that one possible idea was to have UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon oversee it.

  Western diplomats said US willingness to entertain the idea of supporting such a conference highlighted the sharp shift in Washington’s approach to Israel under President Barack Obama.

  US support for a regional nuclear conference could further alienate the Israelis at a time when relations are already tense due to disagreements over Israel’s settlements policy in occupied areas the Palestinians want for a state.

  One Western diplomat said the Israelis were “understandably reluctant” to take part, even if the conference’s outcome would be merely symbolic. However, it would be difficult to refuse if Washington began to put pressure on the Israelis, he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan to purchase 28 more HIMARS

  • 2

    Three former employees of TSMC detained

  • 3

    Jobe Bellingham says he’s anxious about following Jude at Borussia Dortmund

  • 4

    Magnitude 5.5 aftershocks possible after 6.2 quake

  • 5

    Taipei tops list of cities with ‘highest staying power’