A court ruling on whether Thailand’s deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra should lose his fortune for alleged corruption could become the latest flash point in four years of sometimes violent political unrest that has exposed deep divisions in Thai society.
The government of Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is hoping Friday’s decision will lead to a return of stability, but it has hedged its bets, imposing a security crackdown around the country and offering safe houses for the court’s judges, claiming the pro-Thaksin “Red Shirt” movement may be planning violence.
Political passions have led to years of off-and-on street protests, pitting those who view Thaksin as a corrupt demagogue who bought his way to power against those who benefited from his populist policies and see the military coup that ousted him in September 2006 as a grave injustice orchestrated by a ruling elite scared of change.
PHOTO: AFP
The refusal by Thaksin’s opponents to accept the results of post-coup elections that saw his allies return to power led to their occupation of the seat of government for several months and seizure of the capital’s two airports for a week in 2008.
A court ruling that led to the fall of the pro-Thaksin government and Abhisit taking power through parliamentary maneuverings fueled the ire of the Red Shirts, who last year rioted and disrupted a conference of Asian heads of government.
Now, government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn said: “People expect the system to resume functioning normally, the parliamentary system and the economic system. Although we continue to have political differences, the wishes of the people are clear.”
MORE MARCHES
Actual evidence of a return to normalcy is slim. Red Shirt leaders boast of plans for a “million-man march” sometime after the verdict.
State television nightly broadcasts dire warnings of the nefarious intentions of Thaksin and his followers, repeatedly showing footage of Red Shirt rioting last April that had to be quashed by the army. Newspapers publish endless speculation about a coup in the offing.
The Supreme Court will rule on whether Thaksin, a telecommunications mogul, illegally parked his fortune with family members because he was not allowed to hold company shares while prime minister and whether his 2001 to 2006 governments implemented policies to benefit his businesses.
If it finds Thaksin guilty — the almost universal assumption is that it will — the court will also decide whether to seize some or all of the US$2.29 billion chunk of the family fortune frozen in Thai banks.
For Thaksin’s opponents, said political scientist Thitinan Pongsidhirak of Chulalongkorn University, the case marks “the final act of Thaksin’s political decapitation, on the premise that the Red Shirts, the instability, are all because of Thaksin, plus his money, his corruption, manipulation and abuses of power.”
“The bottom line is: Are these Reds really about something more than Thaksin? His opponents will say, ‘No, They’re all because of Thaksin.’ Instead of saying that the Red Shirts have genuine grievances. Instead of acknowledging that they exist, listening to them,” Thitinan said.
STATE OF DENIAL
Such a state of denial, he warns, only intensifies their movement.
Thaksin’s supporters say the charges against him are an outrage, part of a vendetta carried out by a ruling class that felt threatened by his popularity — he won two landslide election victories — and is determined to prevent his comeback.
Thaksin — who denies all the charges against him — fled into exile ahead of a 2008 conflict of interest conviction that resulted in a two-year jail sentence. As he trots the globe cutting business deals, he sends his followers messages — on blogs, through Twitter and by video — bemoaning his fate and exhorting them to keep up the fight.
Opponents say Thaksin was a megalomaniacal crook, who also sought to usurp the power of King Bhumibol Adulyadej. His supporters, primarily from the country’s poor rural majority, which benefited from Thaksin’s innovative social welfare programs, feel robbed of their democratic birthright.
But the Red Shirt movement also encompasses many who while not necessarily Thaksin supporters, feel the coup and subsequent court rulings against his allies are symptoms of greater injustices in Thai society, which has long been dominated by those with ties to the military and palace.
Friends and foes of Thaksin alike doubt the court verdict will clear the air.
The Red Shirts “have been fighting against dictatorship for three years and we will keep on fighting,” says one of their leaders, veteran politician Veera Musigapong.
Whether Thaksin’s money is seized in whole or in part, or released, is irrelevant, he said.
“Our political gatherings will continue, according to our plan to bring back democracy and to overthrow the current government,” he said.
NO END TO SCHISMS
A prominent Thaksin critic thinks a guilty verdict will erode Thaksin’s legitimacy with the public, but not end the schisms in Thai society.
“Even if the assets are seized, the conflict will continue,” says Suriyasai Katasila of the People’s Alliance for Democracy, the group that has been the public face of the anti-Thaksin movement.
“Thaksin will carry out his revenge against his opponents. The clashes of opinions will persist and are not likely to cease for the next couple of years,” Suriyasai said.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese