A court ruling on whether Thailand’s deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra should lose his fortune for alleged corruption could become the latest flash point in four years of sometimes violent political unrest that has exposed deep divisions in Thai society.
The government of Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is hoping Friday’s decision will lead to a return of stability, but it has hedged its bets, imposing a security crackdown around the country and offering safe houses for the court’s judges, claiming the pro-Thaksin “Red Shirt” movement may be planning violence.
Political passions have led to years of off-and-on street protests, pitting those who view Thaksin as a corrupt demagogue who bought his way to power against those who benefited from his populist policies and see the military coup that ousted him in September 2006 as a grave injustice orchestrated by a ruling elite scared of change.
PHOTO: AFP
The refusal by Thaksin’s opponents to accept the results of post-coup elections that saw his allies return to power led to their occupation of the seat of government for several months and seizure of the capital’s two airports for a week in 2008.
A court ruling that led to the fall of the pro-Thaksin government and Abhisit taking power through parliamentary maneuverings fueled the ire of the Red Shirts, who last year rioted and disrupted a conference of Asian heads of government.
Now, government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn said: “People expect the system to resume functioning normally, the parliamentary system and the economic system. Although we continue to have political differences, the wishes of the people are clear.”
MORE MARCHES
Actual evidence of a return to normalcy is slim. Red Shirt leaders boast of plans for a “million-man march” sometime after the verdict.
State television nightly broadcasts dire warnings of the nefarious intentions of Thaksin and his followers, repeatedly showing footage of Red Shirt rioting last April that had to be quashed by the army. Newspapers publish endless speculation about a coup in the offing.
The Supreme Court will rule on whether Thaksin, a telecommunications mogul, illegally parked his fortune with family members because he was not allowed to hold company shares while prime minister and whether his 2001 to 2006 governments implemented policies to benefit his businesses.
If it finds Thaksin guilty — the almost universal assumption is that it will — the court will also decide whether to seize some or all of the US$2.29 billion chunk of the family fortune frozen in Thai banks.
For Thaksin’s opponents, said political scientist Thitinan Pongsidhirak of Chulalongkorn University, the case marks “the final act of Thaksin’s political decapitation, on the premise that the Red Shirts, the instability, are all because of Thaksin, plus his money, his corruption, manipulation and abuses of power.”
“The bottom line is: Are these Reds really about something more than Thaksin? His opponents will say, ‘No, They’re all because of Thaksin.’ Instead of saying that the Red Shirts have genuine grievances. Instead of acknowledging that they exist, listening to them,” Thitinan said.
STATE OF DENIAL
Such a state of denial, he warns, only intensifies their movement.
Thaksin’s supporters say the charges against him are an outrage, part of a vendetta carried out by a ruling class that felt threatened by his popularity — he won two landslide election victories — and is determined to prevent his comeback.
Thaksin — who denies all the charges against him — fled into exile ahead of a 2008 conflict of interest conviction that resulted in a two-year jail sentence. As he trots the globe cutting business deals, he sends his followers messages — on blogs, through Twitter and by video — bemoaning his fate and exhorting them to keep up the fight.
Opponents say Thaksin was a megalomaniacal crook, who also sought to usurp the power of King Bhumibol Adulyadej. His supporters, primarily from the country’s poor rural majority, which benefited from Thaksin’s innovative social welfare programs, feel robbed of their democratic birthright.
But the Red Shirt movement also encompasses many who while not necessarily Thaksin supporters, feel the coup and subsequent court rulings against his allies are symptoms of greater injustices in Thai society, which has long been dominated by those with ties to the military and palace.
Friends and foes of Thaksin alike doubt the court verdict will clear the air.
The Red Shirts “have been fighting against dictatorship for three years and we will keep on fighting,” says one of their leaders, veteran politician Veera Musigapong.
Whether Thaksin’s money is seized in whole or in part, or released, is irrelevant, he said.
“Our political gatherings will continue, according to our plan to bring back democracy and to overthrow the current government,” he said.
NO END TO SCHISMS
A prominent Thaksin critic thinks a guilty verdict will erode Thaksin’s legitimacy with the public, but not end the schisms in Thai society.
“Even if the assets are seized, the conflict will continue,” says Suriyasai Katasila of the People’s Alliance for Democracy, the group that has been the public face of the anti-Thaksin movement.
“Thaksin will carry out his revenge against his opponents. The clashes of opinions will persist and are not likely to cease for the next couple of years,” Suriyasai said.
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their