The Chinese businessman battled for years to get cities to reveal their budgets, but his quest seemed quixotic in a country notorious for keeping citizens in the dark.
Then China did what would once have been unthinkable — it enacted an open-government policy, and last fall Wu Junliang pressed his case with the Guangzhou city government. This time, to his surprise, he won — big time. The largest city in southern China put budget plans for all 114 municipal departments and agencies online.
Astonished citizens flooded the Web site to download documents, causing it to crash by the second day.
It was an eye-opening moment, illustrating the potential of the fledgling Open Government Information regulation to allow Chinese citizens to challenge the government’s culture of secrecy.
“We were all very excited. It’s the first time in 60 years in this country that a city government has released their budget. And more significantly, they put it online so everyone can access it,” said Wu, 51.
Although he says he never set out to be a crusader, his victory was by far the biggest since the regulation took effect nationwide on May 1, 2008, allowing citizens to request information and get a response from the government within 15-30 days.
It’s an important step toward transparency for a country struggling to combat corruption and meet the needs of a rising middle class and an economy that will soon be the second biggest after the US.
“Clearly, nationwide, Chinese have become increasingly aware that they have legal rights and they are becoming more confident in using them,” said Katherine Wilhelm, senior fellow at Yale University’s China Law Center.
Recent years have indeed seen greater openness — public hearings on utility rates, for example — but the new disclosure policy could be the most significant in delivering government accountability.
“This is a starting point but it’s also a turning point,” said law professor Wang Xixin (王鍚鋅) from Peking University. “Traditionally, China’s legal and political culture emphasizes keeping secrets inside government. The idea of open government or transparency is quite new. One of the most significant impacts of ... [the new regulation] is that it helps to change that kind of bureaucratic ideology.”
Although the change applies to all levels of government, its limitations are also clear. Exempt from release are official state secrets, a category so broadly defined that virtually anything — maps, GPS coordinates, even economic statistics — can be withheld.
In theory, the rule can be used to try to pry any information out of any government agency. But ordinary Chinese know to stay away from subjects that would directly threaten the Communist Party’s monopoly on power, such as harassment of political dissidents or anti-government violence in Tibet. And officials can still easily put information beyond the reach of citizens by declaring it a state secret.
Implementation has been slow and uneven. One survey of 30 provinces found that more than 60 percent had failed the criteria for responsiveness. Even Wu’s rare success may not be a total victory — some question whether Guangzhou’s budget numbers are complete.
Still, experts say the new measure could be far-reaching, because it helps establish a foundation for broader legal reforms.
The very idea that citizens are entitled to obtain information from their government was electrifying to many. Requests, from the mundane to the politically sensitive, poured in as Chinese navigated new terrain.
A Beijing dog owner wanted to know where pet-licensing fees were going. A Shanghai lawyer sought specifics about China’s 4 trillion yuan (US$588 billion) stimulus plan. Artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未) asked why so many schoolchildren had perished in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake (5,300 out of 90,000 by official count, but the number is believed to be much higher.)
Beijing alone fielded some 25,000 queries and processed about 500 formal requests in the first couple of months. Many dealt with individual interests, such as property disputes, urban housing demolitions and company restructurings.
Among the first was a query about how much had been collected from tolls on the Beijing Capital Airport Expressway and where the money had gone. The request was filed by Wang, the law professor, who is among a group of legal scholars using the new rule to push open the doors of government.
He got only a partial answer but his effort got extensive media coverage.
“We called it a test case,” he said. “If we filed, would the government respond? But secondly, it was to let the public know they can do it too.”
Shanghai lawyer Yan Yiming is still waiting for specifics on the massive stimulus plan. He filed his third request last month.
“Although a lot of obstacles get in the way, I will stick to it anyway,” he said.
Wu has been portrayed in national publications as a public interest hero, though his glasses and thoughtful manner make him seem more wonkish than populist.
He spent 20 years in the US, earning a master’s degree in political science from the University of Houston and working in financial services there. He now heads a financial assets firm in Shenzhen.
Though he calls it “just a hobby,” budget reform has become his passion. He even created a Web site (www.budgetofchina.com) in 2006, the year before he returned to China. Then he heard about the new disclosure regulation.
“I thought, at least I have something to back me up. I found a weapon I can use,” he said. “Without this regulation, we had no legal way to ask these questions.”
When May 2008 arrived, he and a small band of volunteers sent requests to 36 local governments and to 15 national ministries. Only the Shenzhen city government let him see its budget, but not make copies.
Last fall, he and other volunteers sent another round of requests to major cities and provinces, and within a week came Guangzhou’s astonishing response. Shanghai, which initially said no, reversed itself after hearing about Guangzhou’s decision.
Cai Dingjian (蔡定劍), a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said Wu’s success highlighted the need for public pressure.
“If we only rely on the law to push for openness and there is no pressure from the citizens, the government probably won’t take the initiative to open up its budget information,” he said.
For his part, Wu plans to keep pushing for answers.
“There’s lots of ways to make society progress. People talk about democracy, freedom of speech, free press, which is all important but sometimes hard,” he said. “When you wake up people as taxpayers, it’s easier. I pay tax, you pay tax. You should get something from your government. People understand that.”
The death of a former head of China’s one-child policy has been met not by tributes, but by castigation of the abandoned policy on social media this week. State media praised Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), former head of China’s National Family Planning Commission from 1988 to 1998, as “an outstanding leader” in her work related to women and children. The reaction on Chinese social media to Peng’s death in Beijing on Sunday, just shy of her 96th birthday, was less positive. “Those children who were lost, naked, are waiting for you over there” in the afterlife, one person posted on China’s Sina Weibo platform. China’s
‘NO COUNTRY BUMPKIN’: The judge rejected arguments that former prime minister Najib Razak was an unwitting victim, saying Najib took steps to protect his position Imprisoned former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak was yesterday convicted, following a corruption trial tied to multibillion-dollar looting of the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state investment fund. The nation’s high court found Najib, 72, guilty on four counts of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering related to more than US$700 million channeled into his personal bank accounts from the 1MDB fund. Najib denied any wrongdoing, and maintained the funds were a political donation from Saudi Arabia and that he had been misled by rogue financiers led by businessman Low Taek Jho. Low, thought to be the scandal’s mastermind, remains
Shamans in Peru on Monday gathered for an annual New Year’s ritual where they made predictions for the year to come, including illness for US President Donald Trump and the downfall of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. “The United States should prepare itself because Donald Trump will fall seriously ill,” Juan de Dios Garcia proclaimed as he gathered with other shamans on a beach in southern Lima, dressed in traditional Andean ponchos and headdresses, and sprinkling flowers on the sand. The shamans carried large posters of world leaders, over which they crossed swords and burned incense, some of which they stomped on. In this
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese yesterday announced plans for a national bravery award to recognize civilians and first responders who confronted “the worst of evil” during an anti-Semitic terror attack that left 15 dead and has cast a heavy shadow over the nation’s holiday season. Albanese said he plans to establish a special honors system for those who placed themselves in harm’s way to help during the attack on a beachside Hanukkah celebration, like Ahmed al-Ahmed, a Syrian-Australian Muslim who disarmed one of the assailants before being wounded himself. Sajid Akram, who was killed by police during the Dec. 14 attack, and