Beijing’s abrupt cancelation of the latest session of the UK-China human rights dialogue that had been scheduled for Monday offers an uncomfortable insight into Britain’s relations with the 21st century’s rising superpower. Whether the issue is personal freedom, climate change or nuclear proliferation, the government of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is struggling with a new China syndrome that can be summed up as: “We” don’t like their attitude but “they” couldn’t give two figs.
A spokesman for the UK’s Foreign Office said the human rights meeting, of which there are two a year under a scheme dating back to the Hong Kong handover in 1997, had been postponed rather than canceled. However, official irritation at the apparent snub is palpable. China’s decision was described as “extremely unfortunate,” diplomat-speak for bloody rude.
Beijing gave no reason for its move. While British officials indicated it may have been for “technical reasons,” a more plausible explanation is that Beijing rulers decided to punish Britain for its outspoken criticism of last month’s execution of Akmal Shaikh, a British citizen, for alleged drug offenses.
China’s refusal to entertain numerous clemency pleas from Shaikh’s family and the government was a political as much as a judicial decision. Brown declared himself “appalled.” Another minister said he was sickened. China now seems to be exacting cold revenge for these hot words.
Shaikh’s execution, and the suspension of the human rights dialogue, are a direct kick in the teeth for Britain’s policy of “comprehensive” engagement with China on human rights.
Worse still, from London’s point of view, other recent actions such as the sentencing of Charter 08 author Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) and reports of intensifying arrests, harassment and torture of indigenous Tibetans suggest an ever more confident Beijing is waxing indifferent to Britain’s strategic aim of “increasing understanding of human rights issues on both sides.”
Human rights aside, Sino-British tensions are also being fed by issues such as Beijing’s reluctance to support new sanctions on Iran’s nuclear program and by the public spat in Copenhagen last month when Brown and other ministers publicly blamed China for blocking Britain’s climate change agenda. However, according to China expert Jonathan Fenby, Britain is on a losing wicket in its battles with Beijing.
“China has asserted its determination to protect its own sovereignty whatever the issue, and is intent on doing things its way,” Fenby wrote last month. “Given its economic progress ... the leadership and the population feel pretty good about themselves. They are in no mood to take lessons, moral or otherwise, from the West.”
The onset of summer has sparked a rise in incidents of “mask rage” in South Korea as more hot and bothered commuters either refuse to wear face coverings or leave parts of their faces exposed. In South Korea, Japan and other countries in East Asia, widespread mask wearing has been cited as one possible explanation for the region’s relative success in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control. South Korea, one of the first countries outside China to be affected by the virus, flattened the coronavirus curve in April, although it is now struggling with dozens of daily cases, mainly in and around
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting
CHANGING PERCEPTIONS: In its tender, the Hong Kong administration said that it had failed to ‘mobilise the community to support law enforcement actions’ The Hong Kong government has agreed to pay millions of pounds to a discreet London-based PR firm to counter coverage of the territory in the international media. Consulum, which has also represented Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, was on Monday awarded the ￡5 million (US$6.2 million) one-year contract to improve Hong Kong’s reputation — the same day that China passed national security legislation targeting the territory. The Mayfair-based PR business was founded by Tim Ryan and Matthew Gunther Bushell, two former employees of Bell Pottinger, an agency that has been criticized for representing some governments and leaders that other businesses