Sun, Aug 30, 2009 page4

• DPJ looks to reshape Japan’s economy

  CASH FOR KIDS: The Democratic Party of Japan’s enticing campaign promises are more likely to generate votes than long-term economic prosperity, economists said

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  In one of the most heated political contests in recent memory, Japan’s opposition party is courting voters with an enticing promise: monthly cash for kids.

  By giving families ¥26,000 (US$275) a month per child through junior high, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) hopes to ease parenting costs and encourage more women to give birth in a country where the rapidly aging population is among the gravest long-term threats.

  Parents are already given a lump sum of ¥350,000 for the birth of each child.

  The program is the centerpiece of a plan to steer the world’s ­second-biggest economy to the left, away from what opposition leader Yukio Hatoyama describes as the “fundamentalist pursuit of capitalism” that he says led to last year’s financial crisis.

  If the Democrats dethrone the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) as is widely expected in parliamentary elections today, they vow to put people — not Japan Inc — at the core of their economic policy.

  That would represent a significant change for Japan, which for decades has prioritized industrial interests in the drive to propel the country from its defeat in World War II to its current position as a world economic power.

  Koichi Nakano, a political science professor at Tokyo’s Sophia University, describes the Democrats’ vision as a fundamental departure from the economic model of the past. It would be, in effect, an acceptance that Japan is waning as a global economic leader and needs a more people-centric approach to deal with the issues it now faces.

  Those problems stem from a shrinking and aging population.

  Japan’s population of 127.6 million peaked in 2006, and is expected to decline to 115 million in 2030 and fall below 100 million by the middle of the century.

  The younger generation will need to bear an increasing burden to care for swelling ranks of senior citizens, even as they watch the promise of lifetime employment fade. On Friday, the government reported that the nationwide unemployment rate hit 5.7 percent, the highest level in Japan’s post-World War II era.

  “There are people who still want Japan to be able to compete in the big leagues,” Nakano said. “But others think that Japan is destined to decline, and it becomes a question of managing that decline now that China is such a big power.”

  Whether the Democrats can actually pull it off is the big question.

  In addition to the child payouts, they propose an expensive menu of initiatives: toll-free highways, free high schools, income support for farmers, monthly allowances for job seekers in training, a higher minimum wage and tax cuts. The estimated bill comes to ¥16.8 trillion when fully implemented starting in the 2013 fiscal year.

  That may be too much to handle for a country with a massive fiscal deficit. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development predicts the country’s public debt, already the highest among member countries, may reach 200 percent of GDP next year.

  The party’s labor-friendly policies, such as a ban on the use of temporary workers, are also likely to meet resistance from business groups and a public wary of too much change.

  “I don’t think there’s all that much enthusiasm about the DPJ plan,” Nakano said. “People are generally supporting the DPJ not so much because they like it but because they don’t like the LDP.”

  The Japan Business Federation, better known as Nippon Keidanren, is officially staying neutral. But officials have been critical of the Democrats’ ideas for growth.

  When it comes to Japan’s ­longer-term future, economists also seem dubious.

  Even if the Democrats’ policies result in an uptick in domestic demand, Kyohei Morita, chief economist at Barclays Capital in Tokyo, doubts that it will last. What Japan really needs, he says, is simply more people. And in that regard, giving families ¥26,000 a month is unlikely to result in more babies.

  The Democrats “shouldn’t mention this child allowance as a measure to increase domestic demand,” Morita said. “It’s just an allocation of money to households and what the DPJ will get from this is simply votes, not domestic demand [in the long term].”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Carlos Alcaraz has revenge on Norrie

  • 2

    West Ham beat Brentford on penalties to advance

  • 3

    US’ reprieve will not matter due to lack of intensity

  • 4

    Taiwan’s largest snake fossil, at 4m, found in Tainan

  • 5

    US advances in WBC to face down Domincan Republic