Does money from foreign donors come with strings attached? Dangerously so, according to research last week that claimed foreign governments have corrupted British universities and threatened their academic impartiality.
The report, A Degree of Influence, from the UK’s Centre for Social Cohesion in London, lists the millions of dollars that leading UK universities have accepted from donors in the Middle East, Asia and Russia. Robin Simcox, the author of the report, said foreign donors that give enough money get a say in how things are run.
“Edinburgh and Cambridge received £8 million [US$12 million] each from Prince Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia last year to set up Islamic studies centers,” he said. “He gets to appoint as many as three or five members of the management committee.”
His research is based on analysis of the information on public record and talking to universities. It focuses on Arabic and Islamic studies, but compares them with other area studies.
“Donations from the Middle East are by far the largest, but the Confucius institutes have far more influence for the money they pay,” Simcox said.
China has given about £50,000 to several British universities to set up the Confucius Institutes.
“Universities don’t get much money from the Chinese government, but they have to follow teaching standards and a set curriculum, which includes Tibet and photos of people living in mansions. It’s blatant propaganda,” Simcox said.
The report paints an alarming picture of foreign influence in academic life. But universities refute the criticisms.
Peter Agar, Cambridge University’s development director, said nominees have to be approved by the university.
“Donor representatives will always be in a minority, but may well themselves be academics who can bring an informed external perspective, adding to the expertise of the internal academic members,” he said.
The arrangements protect the university’s academic integrity while enabling a particular academic area to benefit from the input of donor representatives chosen for their interest and expertise in a particular center’s work, he said.
Professor Tim Wright of Sheffield University’s Confucius Institute, said it was “complete nonsense” to suggest the Chinese government or the Chinese Language Council International, which funds it, has any influence over the university curriculum.
“The institute is solely aimed at outreach into the community and we’ve not had any pressure at all on how we teach that either,” he said. “Obviously, it’s totally unacceptable to have any influence on the university. If they had something to say about how we teach evening classes we might look at that, but they haven’t.”
Universities are increasingly dependent on non-UK government money, but this influence “isn’t a big issue in general in most universities,” Wright said.
Diana Warwick, chief executive of the umbrella body Universities UK, insists that all academic programs are subjected to rigorous and independent quality assurance procedures, which ensure openness and high standards.
“There are established cultural and business links between the UK and the Middle East, and also with China. These are important parts of the world for the UK to engage with and understand,” she said.
Even Professor Denis Hayes, the founder of Academics for Academic Freedom, calls the report an “astonishingly weak and naive attempt to discredit major foreign funders” operating in British universities, when, he said, the greater threat is closer to home.
“The British government, ruling through the quangocracy [agencies that operate autonomously], operates much more effectively to influence academic life,” he said. “All the examples given in this document have stronger parallels in the UK. Censorship of discussion is almost ubiquitous in university departments offering teacher education, which have been reorganized around political ends. In education there is no criticism, and self-censorship is the norm.”
Four people jailed in the landmark Hong Kong national security trial of "47 democrats" accused of conspiracy to commit subversion were freed today after more than four years behind bars, the second group to be released in a month. Among those freed was long-time political and LGBTQ activist Jimmy Sham (岑子杰), who also led one of Hong Kong’s largest pro-democracy groups, the Civil Human Rights Front, which disbanded in 2021. "Let me spend some time with my family," Sham said after arriving at his home in the Kowloon district of Jordan. "I don’t know how to plan ahead because, to me, it feels
Poland is set to hold a presidential runoff election today between two candidates offering starkly different visions for the country’s future. The winner would succeed Polish President Andrzej Duda, a conservative who is finishing his second and final term. The outcome would determine whether Poland embraces a nationalist populist trajectory or pivots more fully toward liberal, pro-European policies. An exit poll by Ipsos would be released when polls close today at 9pm local time, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Final results are expected tomorrow. Whoever wins can be expected to either help or hinder the
‘A THREAT’: Guyanese President Irfan Ali called on Venezuela to follow international court rulings over the region, whose border Guyana says was ratified back in 1899 Misael Zapara said he would vote in Venezuela’s first elections yesterday for the territory of Essequibo, despite living more than 100km away from the oil-rich Guyana-administered region. Both countries lay claim to Essequibo, which makes up two-thirds of Guyana’s territory and is home to 125,000 of its 800,000 citizens. Guyana has administered the region for decades. The centuries-old dispute has intensified since ExxonMobil discovered massive offshore oil deposits a decade ago, giving Guyana the largest crude oil reserves per capita in the world. Venezuela would elect a governor, eight National Assembly deputies and regional councilors in a newly created constituency for the 160,000
North Korea has detained another official over last week’s failed launch of a warship, which damaged the naval destroyer, state media reported yesterday. Pyongyang announced “a serious accident” at Wednesday last week’s launch ceremony, which crushed sections of the bottom of the new destroyer. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un called the mishap a “criminal act caused by absolute carelessness.” Ri Hyong-son, vice department director of the Munitions Industry Department of the Party Central Committee, was summoned and detained on Sunday, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported. He was “greatly responsible for the occurrence of the serious accident,” it said. Ri is the fourth person