US Democrats hoping that Samuel Alito will derail his own nomination are so far finding little ammunition in his comments. As President George W. Bush's pick for the Supreme Court entered his third day of the hearings yesterday, Alito was showing that he has mastered the language of politics: Say nothing -- at least nothing controversial.
The conservative Alito's by-the-book responses to the grilling by Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee has earned him nods of approval from Republican supporters.
But a leading Democratic opponent, speaking to reporters on Tuesday, the second day of the hearings, complained that Alito was speaking in generalities to avoid answering questions.
"We are not asking him to take a certain position. We are asking him to take a position. It's that simple," New York Senator Charles Schumer said. "So far he has not."
Democrats are particularly worried because Alito, in replacing Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a moderate, could throw the balance of the nine-member court to the right. That potentially could undercut US women's right to abortion, first read into the Constitution in 1973, and broadly expand executive powers that many critics of the Bush administration believe the president has unconstitutionally usurped.
Alito has been careful to avoid fueling such fears.
Typical of his testimony: "There is nothing that is more important for our republic than the rule of law. No person in this country, no matter how high or powerful, is above the law, and no person in this country is beneath the law."
That was his response to a question from the committee's top Democrat, Senator Patrick Leahy, who asked whether the president could "override the laws and immunize illegal conduct."
Such responses did not sit well with Democrats.
"Americans have no better answers than they did at the outset of the hearings," said Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy.
And when he does answer, it is "vague, inconsistent, and at times, contradictory testimony to what his record shows," Leahy added.
Many Democrats fear Alito would give the nine-justice Supreme Court the fifth and deciding vote to approve Bush's admitted use of warrantless electronic snooping within the US.
O'Connor, retiring after 25 years on the nation's highest court, has provided the fifth and deciding vote in 148 cases. Many of those involved contentious issues such as abortion and affirmative action, or preferences given to nonwhites to promote racial diversity in schools or employment.
Throughout hours of grilling by Democrats and less-stressful questioning by Republicans on Tuesday, the 55-year-old appellate judge repeatedly refused to speak in concrete terms on the ground that he should not air an opinion on a subject that might come before him.
Republicans complained that Democrats have already made up their minds about Alito.
"I do think that there are those who have already decided to vote against your nomination and are looking for some reason to do so," Republican Senator John Cornyn said. "And I think one of the reasons that they may claim is that you've been nonresponsive."
Despite the Democrats' frustration, Alito was to go into further hearings yesterday with a decreased likelihood that they may resort to the politically risky delaying technique of a filibuster to block his nomination.
In the US system, the Senate must approve presidential nominations to most federal courts. The hearing in the 18-member committee, expected to last at least until today, is the first step, supposedly laying groundwork on which the 100 senators can base their votes.
In his testimony, Alito seemed polished and well-prepared to face the Democrats' hostility. He was pressed repeatedly for his views on abortion, one of touchiest questions in US politics.
"I would approach the question with an open mind, and I would listen to the arguments that were made," he told one senator.
DOUBLE-MURDER CASE: The officer told the dispatcher he would check the locations of the callers, but instead headed to a pizzeria, remaining there for about an hour A New Jersey officer has been charged with misconduct after prosecutors said he did not quickly respond to and properly investigate reports of a shooting that turned out to be a double murder, instead allegedly stopping at an ATM and pizzeria. Franklin Township Police Sergeant Kevin Bollaro was the on-duty officer on the evening of Aug. 1, when police received 911 calls reporting gunshots and screaming in Pittstown, about 96km from Manhattan in central New Jersey, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Renee Robeson’s office said. However, rather than responding immediately, prosecutors said GPS data and surveillance video showed Bollaro drove about 3km
Tens of thousands of people on Saturday took to the streets of Spain’s eastern city of Valencia to mark the first anniversary of floods that killed 229 people and to denounce the handling of the disaster. Demonstrators, many carrying photos of the victims, called on regional government head Carlos Mazon to resign over what they said was the slow response to one of Europe’s deadliest natural disasters in decades. “People are still really angry,” said Rosa Cerros, a 42-year-old government worker who took part with her husband and two young daughters. “Why weren’t people evacuated? Its incomprehensible,” she said. Mazon’s
‘MOTHER’ OF THAILAND: In her glamorous heyday in the 1960s, former Thai queen Sirikit mingled with US presidents and superstars such as Elvis Presley The year-long funeral ceremony of former Thai queen Sirikit started yesterday, with grieving royalists set to salute the procession bringing her body to lie in state at Bangkok’s Grand Palace. Members of the royal family are venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures, and lavished with glowing media coverage and gold-adorned portraits hanging in public spaces and private homes nationwide. Sirikit, the mother of Thai King Vajiralongkorn and widow of the nation’s longest-reigning monarch, died late on Friday at the age of 93. Black-and-white tributes to the royal matriarch are being beamed onto towering digital advertizing billboards, on
POWER ABUSE WORRY: Some people warned that the broad language of the treaty could lead to overreach by authorities and enable the repression of government critics Countries signed their first UN treaty targeting cybercrime in Hanoi yesterday, despite opposition from an unlikely band of tech companies and rights groups warning of expanded state surveillance. The new global legal framework aims to bolster international cooperation to fight digital crimes, from child pornography to transnational cyberscams and money laundering. More than 60 countries signed the declaration, which means it would go into force once ratified by those states. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the signing as an “important milestone,” and that it was “only the beginning.” “Every day, sophisticated scams destroy families, steal migrants and drain billions of dollars from our economy...
RSS