A coalition of 14 legal, human rights, and anti-torture organizations is intervening in one of the most important cases to reach Britain's highest court, the House of Lords. The case, which started yesterday, was to be heard by a panel of seven judges instead of the usual five, and will be watched by governments around the globe.
The resultant ruling -- whether or not evidence obtained abroad from third parties who may have been tortured is admissible in domestic courts -- is "likely to have profound implications for the worldwide ban on torture," according to the non-governmental organization Human Rights Watch, one of the interveners.
The judges will hear an appeal against a 2-1 decision by the appeal court of England and Wales last year that the British government was entitled to rely on such evidence in special terrorism cases, as long as Britain "neither procured nor connived at" the torture.
"When it comes to torture, the rules of the game must not change," said Holly Cartner, a spokeswoman for the US-based Human Rights Watch.
Under the UN Convention Against Torture, to which 140 states including Britain are party, evidence obtained under torture is inadmissible in any court proceedings. But the appeal court held that, because the convention is not part of UK law, the courts did not have to exclude such evidence. The House of Lords ruling, expected by the end of the year, could have an impact on Britain's attempts to return terrorist suspects to countries with poor human rights records such as Jordan and Algeria .
The lords' appeal is by 10 foreign nationals, mainly Algerians, subjected to indefinite detention without trial in the high-security Belmarsh prison, south London, and elsewhere before the House of Lords ruled the regime unlawful last December.

DOUBLE-MURDER CASE: The officer told the dispatcher he would check the locations of the callers, but instead headed to a pizzeria, remaining there for about an hour A New Jersey officer has been charged with misconduct after prosecutors said he did not quickly respond to and properly investigate reports of a shooting that turned out to be a double murder, instead allegedly stopping at an ATM and pizzeria. Franklin Township Police Sergeant Kevin Bollaro was the on-duty officer on the evening of Aug. 1, when police received 911 calls reporting gunshots and screaming in Pittstown, about 96km from Manhattan in central New Jersey, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Renee Robeson’s office said. However, rather than responding immediately, prosecutors said GPS data and surveillance video showed Bollaro drove about 3km

Tens of thousands of people on Saturday took to the streets of Spain’s eastern city of Valencia to mark the first anniversary of floods that killed 229 people and to denounce the handling of the disaster. Demonstrators, many carrying photos of the victims, called on regional government head Carlos Mazon to resign over what they said was the slow response to one of Europe’s deadliest natural disasters in decades. “People are still really angry,” said Rosa Cerros, a 42-year-old government worker who took part with her husband and two young daughters. “Why weren’t people evacuated? Its incomprehensible,” she said. Mazon’s

‘MOTHER’ OF THAILAND: In her glamorous heyday in the 1960s, former Thai queen Sirikit mingled with US presidents and superstars such as Elvis Presley The year-long funeral ceremony of former Thai queen Sirikit started yesterday, with grieving royalists set to salute the procession bringing her body to lie in state at Bangkok’s Grand Palace. Members of the royal family are venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures, and lavished with glowing media coverage and gold-adorned portraits hanging in public spaces and private homes nationwide. Sirikit, the mother of Thai King Vajiralongkorn and widow of the nation’s longest-reigning monarch, died late on Friday at the age of 93. Black-and-white tributes to the royal matriarch are being beamed onto towering digital advertizing billboards, on

POWER ABUSE WORRY: Some people warned that the broad language of the treaty could lead to overreach by authorities and enable the repression of government critics Countries signed their first UN treaty targeting cybercrime in Hanoi yesterday, despite opposition from an unlikely band of tech companies and rights groups warning of expanded state surveillance. The new global legal framework aims to bolster international cooperation to fight digital crimes, from child pornography to transnational cyberscams and money laundering. More than 60 countries signed the declaration, which means it would go into force once ratified by those states. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the signing as an “important milestone,” and that it was “only the beginning.” “Every day, sophisticated scams destroy families, steal migrants and drain billions of dollars from our economy...