Concerns about the future of Hong Kong's autonomy under Chinese rule grew yesterday following reports that Beijing may flout the territory's mini-constitution in appointing a new leader.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa (
However, with both Tung and the government dodging questions on the reports, speculation was rife about the timing of any resignation.
PHOTO: AP
Reports yesterday suggested that Tung may put off an announcement until next weekend when he is to be elected as a vice-chairman of China's prestigious political advisory body, the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).
His resignation, with more than two years to go until the end of his term, would confirm strong rumors in circulation since Tung was nominated a week ago for the post, one usually reserved for retiring officials.
Tung, in Beijing for the annual gathering of CPPCC delegates, has said only that he would speak at "an appropriate time."
He is expected to meet Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Analysts and politicians say the secrecy over such an important issue bodes ill for Hong Kong's promised "high degree of autonomy" within China's autocratic one-party state.
"China is just walking over us," said Legislator Emily Lau (劉慧卿), an outspoken critic of Tung's administration.
Hong Kong was handed back to China with the promise that it could maintain its capitalist way of life for at least 50 years and that local people would run the city under "one country, two systems."
Those promises were codified in the Basic Law, the constitution drawn up by China and Britain which came into force in 1997.
The US urged further strides towards democracy in the city, amid concern that Tung's departure would erode past reforms.
"US policy has consistently been to support the aspirations of the Hong Kong people for democracy," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said.
"Whatever decisions are made there, we think there should be continued movement in the direction specified by the Basic Law and in the direction desired by the Hong Kong people, which is democracy," he said.
Unease was also growing over reports that China was likely to appoint a successor just to serve the remaining two years of Tung's term, even though the Basic Law stipulates the chief executive shall be appointed for a five-year stint.
Several newspapers said on Friday that Hong Kong Chief Secretary Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) would be appointed to serve the remainder of Tung's term so that China's leaders can assess whether he is the right man for the job.
If not, it may consider other candidates for the next term starting in 2007, according to the South China Morning Post.
Tung's resignation has been mooted since July 2003 when more than 500,000 people marched in protest over an unpopular anti-subversion law proposed by China. The rally sparked a political crisis from which Tung never recovered.
Critically low popularity ratings diminished the small mandate he had and a huge rally a year later amid a brewing row over the timing of democratic reforms hobbled him further.
Tung is believed to have offered his resignation twice before, only to be rebutted by a leadership keen not to cause waves in the city's political establishment.
Analysts say the new Chinese leadership that last year supplanted Tung's mentor and former president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) was less willing to tolerate Tung.
The death of a former head of China’s one-child policy has been met not by tributes, but by castigation of the abandoned policy on social media this week. State media praised Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), former head of China’s National Family Planning Commission from 1988 to 1998, as “an outstanding leader” in her work related to women and children. The reaction on Chinese social media to Peng’s death in Beijing on Sunday, just shy of her 96th birthday, was less positive. “Those children who were lost, naked, are waiting for you over there” in the afterlife, one person posted on China’s Sina Weibo platform. China’s
‘NO COUNTRY BUMPKIN’: The judge rejected arguments that former prime minister Najib Razak was an unwitting victim, saying Najib took steps to protect his position Imprisoned former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak was yesterday convicted, following a corruption trial tied to multibillion-dollar looting of the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state investment fund. The nation’s high court found Najib, 72, guilty on four counts of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering related to more than US$700 million channeled into his personal bank accounts from the 1MDB fund. Najib denied any wrongdoing, and maintained the funds were a political donation from Saudi Arabia and that he had been misled by rogue financiers led by businessman Low Taek Jho. Low, thought to be the scandal’s mastermind, remains
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese yesterday announced plans for a national bravery award to recognize civilians and first responders who confronted “the worst of evil” during an anti-Semitic terror attack that left 15 dead and has cast a heavy shadow over the nation’s holiday season. Albanese said he plans to establish a special honors system for those who placed themselves in harm’s way to help during the attack on a beachside Hanukkah celebration, like Ahmed al-Ahmed, a Syrian-Australian Muslim who disarmed one of the assailants before being wounded himself. Sajid Akram, who was killed by police during the Dec. 14 attack, and
VISHNU VANDALS: A Cambodian official accused Thailand of destroying a statue in a disputed border area, with video showing the Hindu structure being torn down The Thai military said ceasefire talks with Cambodia, set to begin yesterday, are expected to conclude with a meeting of the countries’ defense ministers on Saturday, as the two sides seek to end weeks of deadly clashes. The talks started at 4pm in Thailand’s Chanthaburi Province, which borders Cambodia. The Thai Ministry of Defense outlined several demands to be discussed ahead of the bilateral meeting of the General Border Committee (GBC) on Saturday. If secretariat-level discussions fail to reach agreement on key technical frameworks such as troop deployments, the Thai side would not proceed with the GBC meeting or sign any agreement on