The Sept. 11 commission's major recommendation for the creation of a powerful new national intelligence director gained momentum on Monday, with an influential Republican senator suggesting that he was willing to oppose the White House and offer legislation providing the new intelligence director with broad budgetary and personnel authority over the nation's 15 intelligence agencies.
"That person would be empowered with the authority to really lead the intelligence community," said the lawmaker, Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, chairman of the Senate intelligence committee. "These authorities include the ability to hire and fire, as well as the ability to exercise control over the budgets."
Roberts said a draft bill, written with his committee's ranking Democrat, Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, would be presented to Senate colleagues this week and would be built around the recommendations of the final report of the Sept. 11 commission.
The commission's report, which has created a whirlwind of unusual midsummer activity on Capitol Hill, documented intelligence and law-enforcement failures before the Sept. 11 attacks and called for a shake-up of the CIA and other intelligence agencies, including appointment of a national intelligence director to oversee all spy agencies, including those within the defense department.
While Roberts did not say so explicitly, his description of the powers of the national intelligence director made clear that his bill would go far beyond what the White House and the Pentagon have said they are ready to accept. A spokesman for Roberts, Sarah Little, said later that the bill would definitely "go beyond what the White House is talking about."
US President George W. Bush has said he supports the Sept. 11 panel's recommendation for a national intelligence director, who would replace the director of central intelligence as the nation's chief spymaster, but the White House proposal would not provide the post with the broad authority that the bipartisan commission wants.
Pentagon officials have suggested that a more powerful national intelligence director, by taking away power now held by defense department intelligence agencies, might interfere with military operations.
The White House proposal has been criticized by members of the commission, who say that the national intelligence director needs full budgetary and personnel control in order to end the turf-battles and miscommunication that plague the government's intelligence agencies.
Rockefeller, appearing with Roberts at a hearing of the Senate governmental affairs committee, praised Bush's decision to support the creation of a national intelligence director. But he said that the president's "decision to deviate from the commission's recommendation to give this director real budget and personnel authority was a bigger step, in my mind, backwards."
He said Congress was going to have to "break some china around here" and "invest authority in the national intelligence director for budget and for personnel and the rest of it."
His remarks came at a hearing at which three former directors of central intelligence testified that if Congress created a national intelligence director, the job must have clear authority, including control over the intelligence community's estimated US$40 billion annual budget.
"The intelligence community does not need a feckless czar with fine surroundings and little authority," said William Webster, who led the CIA during the Reagan administration and first Bush administration. and is also a former director of the FBI. "That is the wrong way to go." He testified that "the designated leader must be clearly and unambiguously empowered to act and to decide on issues of great importance to the success of the intelligence community."
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the