Thu, Jul 01, 2004 page7

• NATO summit sparks new divisions over Iraq

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  NATO's decision to help train Iraqi armed forces has set off wrangling among the allies, as more differences emerged between the US and France on how to best help Baghdad's new government.

  At a summit designed to emphasize NATO unity after deep divisions caused by the US-led war on Iraq 15 months ago, France and the US also clashed over Afghanistan and Turkey's relations with the EU.

  As the alliance struggles to define its role in a post-Cold War world, French President Jacques Chirac forcefully stated his opposition to any collective NATO presence on the ground in Iraq, suggesting it should limit its role to coordinating national efforts and training outside the country.

  

  Finnish President Tarja Halonen points her finger at US President George Bush as Swedish Foreign Minster Laila Freivalds, left, and Latvian President Vaira Vike Freiberga listen on Tuesday at the NATO Summit in Istanbul.

  PHOTO: EPA

  "I am completely hostile to the idea of a NATO establishment in Iraq," Chirac told reporters. "It would be dangerous, counterproductive and misunderstood by the Iraqis, who after all deserve a little bit of respect.

  The months of delays have cast doubt on NATO's credibility as it reinvents itself as a global security force in the post-Cold War era.

  Chirac accused US President George W. Bush of meddling in EU affairs by pushing for the EU to bring Turkey into its ranks.

  "It's a bit like if I told the United States how they should manage their relations with Mexico," the French leader said.

  US officials insisted the Iraqi training program should be a centralized operation under a NATO command in Iraq -- although they accepted that reluctant countries, such as France and Germany, could limit their contribution to training outside the country.

  With allies stressing the urgency of aiding the fledgling Iraqi forces following the surprise transfer of power to the new government on Monday, the debate on how NATO puts its agreement into practice will start when alliance envoys meet today in Brussels.

  On Afghanistan, Chirac rejected a US proposal that NATO's elite new response force be deployed to provide security for elections scheduled in September.

  France agreed with other allies that NATO should send hundreds more troops for the elections, but said the response force should be used only for emergency situations, not for peacekeeping.

  The force is "meant to act in a known crisis, which is obviously not the case in Afghanistan today," Chirac said on Monday, the first day of the summit. Diplomats said the issue provoked a sharp exchange in Istanbul between US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his French counterpart, Michele Alliot-Marie.

  France was not the only country with reservations, but the US said the force would be an ideal solution to NATO's difficulties in mustering troops for Afghanistan.

  As usual, the US was backed by Britain. "The key is that the response force NATO has is deployed to help the elections," said Prime Minister Tony Blair.

  One possible solution could be using the NATO Response Force as an "over the horizon" force held in reserve to help peacekeeping in Afghanistan in a crisis. Officials said a reconnaissance team from the force could visit Afghanistan soon to assess how it could be involved.

  The alliance agreed in October to expand the force but has been unable to persuade governments to provide needed troops, apart from Germany, which sent 240 soldiers to Kunduz.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    Police identify man who engaged in indecency at park

  • 3

    TSMC expects global chip revenue to hit US$1.5tn

  • 4

    Trump weighs Taiwan arms package

  • 5

    No surprises at Xi-Trump talks: MAC