Australia is discussing buying US missiles, including some capable of shooting down hostile missiles in space as part of a high-tech defense shield which the government yesterday acknowledged could fuel a regional arms race.
As part of its 15.8 billion Australian dollars (US$10.3 billion) defense budget, the federal government intends to buy three air warfare destroyers for the navy. Defense Minister Robert Hill said they may be armed with the missiles.
US defense officials were in Australia yesterday negotiating a memorandum of understanding on Australia's involvement in the US missile defense shield dubbed "Son of Star Wars."
"It's got the capability to basically meet and intercept missiles outside of the atmosphere, long-range three stage missiles that can do what the Americans did, destroy an incoming missile 137km above the earth traveling at 3.7km a second," Hill told Australian Broadcasting Corp radio yesterday.
He was referring to a successful missile interception test the US military conducted last month in the Pacific from an AEGIS cruiser.
The current US missile defense plans are less ambitious than US President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative of 1983. He envisioned an impenetrable shield against the Soviet Union's arsenal of thousands of missiles. That effort, derided as "Star Wars" by its critics, was later dropped.
Washington hopes that developing a shield against ballistic missiles will protect it against potential threats from countries like North Korea. It wants allies such as Britain, Canada and Australia involved in the project, particularly for the use of satellite tracking stations in their countries.
Asked if Australia's moves could escalate an Asian arms race, Hill said: "There is an argument that that would encourage others to develop their attack missiles further or to proliferate them. But the proliferation is already there."
Hill's comments came just days before General Richard Myers, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, was due to visit Australia.
Myers spent Monday in Japan, another nation that has approved spending billions buying US missiles to bolster its defenses.
Australia has in the past angered some Asian neighbors with its close strategic links to the US and Washington's defense policies.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard sent shock waves through the region last year when he suggested he might launch pre-emptive strikes at terror camps in the region if they were perceived to be a threat to Australia.
Not long after, US President George W. Bush's called Australia its sheriff in the region, a suggestion that riled then-Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad who frequently clashed with Howard during his tenure.
"I can assure Australia that if it acts as a sheriff in this country he will be treated as a terrorist and dealt with as a terrorist," Mahathir said last October.
In Jakarta, an opposition lawmaker in the Indonesian parliament insisted yesterday that Indonesia was a clear target of any proposed missile defense system Australia would adopt.
"We are really concerned with this military build-up, it's not defensive anymore, it's offensive already," lawmaker Djoko Susilo said.
Canberra had already decided it would also buy air-to-surface attack cruise missiles which would be launched from fighter jets and surveillance planes.
"We're planning to equip our FA-18s and the P3 Orions with what you would call a cruise missile," Hill said.
Ron Huisken, an expert in US defense policy, said the government needed to justify such systems were necessary.
"It's a complicated business. It makes a big difference whether you aspire to defend Australia itself or whether you aspire to defend Australian expeditionary forces going overseas, there's a lot of holes in the story so far before we spend lots of money," said Huisken, who is based a the Australian National University.
Hill announced last year plans by the government to spend A$15.8 billion (US$10.3 billion) on defense, or 1.9 percent of the nation's economic output, for the fiscal year.
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their
RSS