The Indian media and opposition hailed yesterday the government's decision not to send troops to Iraq, as press reports indicated the prime minister himself had pulled the plug on the controversial proposal.
Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee had initially been open to Washington's request that India provide some 17,000 troops to a stabilization force in war-wracked Iraq, a report in the Hindu newspaper said.
But he eventually rejected it after it became clear that the troops were likely to have to stay at least two-and-a-half years and had a high chance of suffering deaths and injuries, it said.
Vajpayee also feared there would be bad publicity for his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ahead of key state and national elections should Indian soldiers be brought home in bodybags, the daily said.
The Indian cabinet announced on Monday it would not send troops to Iraq unless under a UN mandate, although it was ready to help in the reconstruction of the country.
In an editorial, the Hindu described the decision as "right and sensible" as there was no reason to stake the lives of soldiers spending huge national funds for "an illegitimate act of aggression."
It added that India should not feel obliged to send troops even if the UN took the helm of the peacekeeping operations in Iraq.
"Having taken the right and sensible decision, the Indian government must now act in conjunction with other countries to put pressure on the US and UK to disengage from Iraq -- by agreeing, among other things, to give primacy to the United Nations in the task of rehabilitation and reconstruction," the Hindu said.
The Times of India said the US had provided no clear answers to the two main issues for India -- whether Washington had a clear roadmap for transferring power to a democratic Iraqi regime and the level of autonomy Indian troops would enjoy.
It added the growing number of attacks on US troops in Iraq made a strong case for their exit.
"For New Delhi to become a party to this political mess would have required not statesmanship, but an impossible faith in the American commitment to do right by Iraq," it said.
However, the Indian Express newspaper criticized the government decision, saying it had taken refuge behind the "fig leaf of a UN mandate," rather than acting as a responsible power interested in helping war-torn Iraq.
"We must of course support the UN, but the UN is not a mantra for the pursuit of our national interests. Unfortunately, the way we handled Iraq reflects poorly on our ability to act as a major power," it said.
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the