Mon, Jun 02, 2003 page6

• Bush, Blair did not do proper research

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The CIA is reviewing its intelligence, British agents are reportedly doubting their own assessments and Saddam Hussein's enemies are being accused of manufacturing evidence as the White House pulls words like "bureaucracy" out of its rhetorical hat to explain why it could have lied to the world rather than drawing appropriate conclusions from the evidence at hand.

  Now, senior politicians on both sides of the Atlantic want answers to what is becoming the most asked question since major combat ended in Iraq: Where are the nuclear, biological and chemical weapons the US-led coalition said it went to war to destroy?

  US President George W. Bush said this weekend that weapons had already been found. As evidence, though, he pointed to two suspected biological laboratories which both the Pentagon and American weapons hunters have said do not constitute arms.

  

  A statue featuring a central figure beneath a crescent moon stands atop a pedestal where a statue of Saddam Hussein once stood, is seen on Saturday in Al Firdos Square in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad. A group of young Iraqi artists, sculptors and actors calling themselves Al Najeen, The Survivors, unveiled the statue Thursday.

  PHOTO: AP

  For a war fought without the backing of the international community, evidence of the weapons Iraq claimed it no longer had would bolster US credibility around the world.

  Now that 11 weeks have passed without such proof, international pressure is mounting on Bush and his coalition partners. The Pentagon is sending a new group of weapons hunters to Iraq to expand the search beginning on Monday.

  British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who visited Iraq this week, said Saturday there is "no doubt whatever that the evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction will be there. Absolutely."

  "I certainly do know some of the stuff that has been already accumulated as the result of interviews, and others which is not yet public -- but what we are going to do is assemble that evidence and present it properly to people," Blair told Sky News television.

  Speaking during a visit to the Russian city of St. Petersburg, Blair said there were "literally hundreds, possibly thousands, of potential WMD sites that are still being investigated. We have only just begun that task."

  But Clare Short, who quit Blair's Cabinet on May 12 to protest the government's Iraq policy, was quoted as saying she had seen British intelligence reports on Iraq and they did not support the claim.

  "The suggestion that there was a risk of chemical and biological weapons being weaponized and threatening us in a short time was spin," Short was quoted as saying by The Sunday Telegraph newspaper. "That didn't come from the security sources."

  But even as Blair and Bush express confidence, members of Bush's Cabinet are offering up alternative theories that have drawn deep concerns both at home and abroad.

  Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld speculated this week that the weapons were destroyed on the eve of fighting. His deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, said in an interview with Vanity Fair magazine that weapons of mass destruction became a war banner because it was the only reason everyone in the administration could agree upon when citing why they were going after Saddam.

  "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying in a Pentagon transcript of an interview with Vanity Fair.

  The comments caused a stir in Europe, where lawmakers from such coalition countries as Britain and Denmark demanded their governments open inquiries into the matter. At home, members of Congress are also questioning the war motives.

  And in countries that opposed the war, the comments are being used as fodder to justify those positions.

  Germany's Frankfurter Allge-meine Zeitung interpreted Rumsfeld's comments as a sign the United States was losing the credibility battle.

  "The charge of deception is inescapable," the paper said.

  And the leading French daily Le Monde called the weapons of mass destruction claim "the greatest lie told by statesmen in recent years."

  US-led teams, made up of Special Forces, unconventional weapons experts, military intelligence and scientists began visiting suspected sites in the opening days of the war. Since the fighting broke out March 20, most US and British intelligence leads have been exhausted. Teams are now chasing tips from local Iraqis, none of which have panned out so far.

  As of Monday, the weapons hunters will begin working for a new Pentagon-led group of some 1,400 people, including US weapons experts who once served as UN weapons inspectors.

  The Iraq Survey Group will be led by Keith Dayton, a two-star general. Troops involved in the search hope the ISG will be able to provide the effort with better intelligence and analysis.

  Dayton, a top official in the Defense Intelligence Agency, said he remains convinced his team will find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

  Those assessments were doubted by many members of the UN Security Council, which last fall agreed to send international inspectors back to Iraq to verify the country no longer had the weapons it was prevented from producing after the 1991 Gulf War.

  The quality of that intelligence is now being reviewed by the CIA, whose director, George Tenet, released a rare statement Friday defending his agency.

  "Our role is to call it like we see it -- to tell policymakers what we know, what we don't know, what we think and what we base it on," Tenet said. "The integrity of our process was maintained throughout and any suggestion to the contrary is simply wrong."

  British intelligence is reportedly taking stock of its own assessments as well.

  On Thursday, the British Broadcasting Corp. reported that agents were unhappy with a dossier Blair's office released on Iraqi weapons last year -- particularly its claim that Saddam was able to launch such weapons on 45 minutes' notice.

  The network quoted an unidentified intelligence source who said intelligence agencies added that charge at the behest of the prime minister's office, but now believe it was wrong.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Suspect and two more dead after attacks in Taipei

  • 2

    Post office, driver’s license changes coming

  • 3

    Events get extra security after Taipei knife attacks

  • 4

    Car blast kills Russian general hours after US talks

  • 5

    Police to be deployed to crowded areas