Hundreds of farmers yesterday rallied in front of the Executive Yuan in Taipei to protest the Council of Indigenous Peoples “forcibly removing” them from their homes and “confiscating” their farmland.
Wu Tien-yu (吳天祐), chairman of the Taiwan Association for the Rights of Non-Aboriginal Residents in Mountain Indigenous Townships, led the rally, which was attended by members of the Association for the Rights of Nantou County Residents and farmers’ groups nationwide.
Wu accused the council of political persecution by launching lawsuits against the members of his organization and affiliated farmers’ groups, saying that it had unfairly labeled them as “intruding outsiders illegally occupying Aboriginal territory.”
“Many of our members have lived in the mountains for several generations, cultivating crops for their livelihoods. Most have legally obtained use of their land, and have paid land leases and other fees,” Wu said.
“The government has done much to protect the rights of Aboriginal people, but what about non-Aboriginal farmers? Our rights are being violated, but no one speaks up for us. We are farmers and residents in these townships, so we must be treated fairly as well, because we too are citizens of this country,” he said.
The groups brought Taoist priests to conduct a traditional ceremony involving prayer and chanting to seek divine help for their cause.
The farmers presented petitions to the Executive Yuan and the council demanding that laws be amended to permit the sale, ownership and leasing of the lands they cultivate, and to legalize the land ownership of farmers cultivating forest land.
They also demanded eligibility for farmers’ insurance and subsidies for agricultural damage from typhoons and other natural disasters.
Wu presented reports and figures showing that there are 70,000 “Han farmers” and non-Aboriginal residents with household registry in Aboriginal districts.
When their family members are included, it totals about 200,000 people, Wu said.
“The government and the council must not ignore our existence. [We] have been cultivating and taking up agriculture in Aboriginal areas for generations,” he added.
Other group members said that the council has taken up litigation to force them out on alleged breaches of the Soil and Water Conservation Act (水土保持法), the Forestry Act (森林法) and other laws, citing a case from last year in which an 82-year-old woman was indicted and later sentenced to three months in prison.
“She had only built a simple hut as her residence and grew some fruit trees on designated Aboriginal land. This old lady had been living in this place for more than 50 years,” Wu said.
“The court convicted her for breaching the Soil and Water Conservation Act, but the law was enacted in 1994 and exempted residents who had already been residing in the affected districts, so the prosecution in the case was unjustified,” he added.
The council in a statement said that the Regulations on Development and Management of the Lands Reserved for Indigenous Peoples (原住民保留地開發管理辦法) take into consideration the land use rights of Aborigines and non-Aborigines, and “as long as non-Aboriginal residents do not contravene the law or breach leasing contracts, they can continue with current land use... The government has no plans to take back all the lands as the farmers’ groups have claimed.”
Taiwan might be China’s next target after it has “walled off” Hong Kong from the rest of the world with its new national security legislation, Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology fellow Wu Jieh-min (吳介民) said on Thursday. At a seminar organized by the Economic Democracy Union, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, the Hong Kong Outlanders and the Judicial Reform Foundation, Wu said that the legislation is simultaneously a fig leaf concealing Beijing’s autocratic rule in Hong Kong and a figurative “Berlin Wall,” denying democratic countries access to Hong Kong. Wu said it is evident that Taiwan would be China’s next target. The
SAFETY CONCERNS: A construction company working nearby admitted to negligence in the incident, and is to pay a fine and other expenses related to damages Residents of homes adjacent to an alleyway in New Taipei City’s Yonghe District (永和) on Saturday were forced to evacuate their homes after the road collapsed, the New Taipei City government said yesterday. An 80m by 4m area in an alleyway on Wenhua Road (文化路) collapsed at 10:39am near an apartment building construction site where work was being done on the project’s foundation. The incident also ruptured an underground gas pipe and tilted several buildings in the area. Residents would not be able to return to their homes until tomorrow or Wednesday, when repairs are expected to be finished, the city government said. Workers
ARMS RACE: Two DPP lawmakers said that China’s development model differed from Taiwan’s, as it aims to become a global hegemon, while Taiwan seeks to protect itself Taiwanese national defense experts are split on how Taiwan should respond to the ever-growing budget of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with some advocating for Taiwan to increase defense spending, while others say that little can be done. The Legislative Yuan approved NT$358 billion (US$12.1 billion) for national defense spending across fiscal 2020, a 3.47 percent increase compared with last year, while China’s military budget this year is NT$5.4 trillion, more than 15 times that of Taiwan. Regardless of whether the government adopts a zero-based budgeting method for national defense spending — in which all expenses are justified and approved each
Taiwan is the second-safest country in the world, after Qatar, according to visitors to an online database, who voted on 133 countries and territories worldwide. In online database Numbeo’s Crime Index by Country 2020 Mid-Year survey, Taiwan scored 84.74 out of 100 for safety. That score put Taiwan in second place, followed by the United Arab Emirates with 84.55 and Georgia with 79.50. The top ranked country, Qatar, had a safety score of 88.10. Numbeo said that the results were based on surveys of visitors to its Web site who were asked to rate the safety and overall level of crime