Taipei Times: You termed the DPP Central Executive Committee’s decision to delay the party’s presidential primary as the “last straw that broke the camel’s back” in your decision to quit the party. Why would you describe it that way?
Michael Tsai (蔡明憲): The practice of holding presidential and legislative primaries has been in place in the DPP for more than two decades. The rules were set and people competed fairly and openly — that, is the value of democracy.
In a departure from the past practice of beginning the presidential primary process in July or August, the committee this time finalized the timetable as early as mid-February, with registration to start on March 18.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
That it moved forward the timetable so much smelled of something wrong, as if it was made under the promise that only President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would be running in the primary, leaving other potential aspirants with little time to prepare.
President Tsai has tried hard, yet has fared poorly in polls over the past one or two years, and it showed in the results of the local elections in November last year.
Following the big defeats, many people, including me, had hoped that the president would engage in introspection and review what the DPP administration has failed to do well in its governance, as well as the public’s grievances and complaints.
However, we see that she has done very little of that, even nothing. She has said that she has done a lot and well, and it is just that people do not know how to follow.
Is it right to put the blame on the public? That I cannot accept.
[Former premier] William Lai (賴清德) apparently sent party headquarters into a panic when he registered for the primary, because he enjoyed a high approval rate in [media] polls. Tsai would surely lose if party headquarters were to stick to the original timetable of conducting polls one month after the primary registration period closed.
DPP headquarters has since [Lai’s registration] changed the schedule twice.
The first time I could understand, because President Tsai was overseas making state visits, but the second time was wrong — it was clearly tailored for President Tsai. It was because she only has a 20-something percent approval rating and today still lags behind Lai by nearly 15 percentage points. So the committee, in support of her, changed the polling schedule.
Democracy means being fair, reasonable and respectful, but the decision by DPP headquarters and the committee has been unfair to other contenders, as well as unreasonable and disrespectful to tradition.
Over the past few years in particular, with President Tsai at the party’s helm, I have been very disappointed with her.
From 2012 to 2016 when she was DPP chairperson, it was normal for her to want to appoint people from within her inner circle. However, they should be very objective and reasonable in making suggestions that reflected the opinions of the public.
If the people in her inner circle are all “yes, sir, yes, ma’am” types, that would be problematic for her decisionmaking.
For example, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in 2012 wanted to abolish compulsory military conscription and institute an all-volunteer force instead. That was wrong, in my opinion, in light of Taiwan’s military capability, national defense and security in the face of China’s threats.
Following suggestions from me, the Ministry of National Defense and even the US, Ma decided to delay implementation of the all-volunteer military until the end of 2013, then until his term was up [when he still did not implement it].
Soon after Tsai Ing-wen assumed the presidency in 2016, her aides suggested that she institute an all-volunteer military. I penned suggestions to her on why the nation must keep both systems and the grave consequences there might be if we abolish mandatory conscription.
My suggestions, tendered twice, fell on deaf ears. No response, not even a thank-you note.
What happened to me was a small thing, but the point was that she should have at least consulted rather than simply decided so because she wanted peace with China.
Sources in the National Security Council have told me that while they did discuss the matter, the political consideration was that because Ma had decided to abolish mandatory conscription, President Tsai would lose many votes if she went back on abolishment.
Come on, what is more important, national security or electoral considerations?
The issue of the military’s budget is another reason [for leaving the party]. I was involved in budget planning during my terms as vice minister of national defense from 2004 to 2006 and as minister of national defense in 2008. The proposed annual defense budget in 2008 — more than 10 years ago — was NT$330 billion [US$10.68 billion at the current exchange rate], about 2.7 to 2.8 percent of the nation’s GDP.
In her presidential campaign, Tsai Ing-wen had pledged a defense budget of 3 percent of GDP, but from 2016 to now, the defense budget has been estimated at NT$340 billion annually, nearly same as that 10 years ago.
It was good that the president in various speeches emphasized the importance of national defense, as that boosted morale. However, the thing is, when you look from the nation’s perspective, what have been the actual actions?
TT: Having been a defense minister, are you worried about the Tsai administration’s national security team?
Michael Tsai: Not just worried, but desperate.
China’s military might continues to increase. As early as last year, when Chinese jets began circling Taiwan, I suggested that the president — the commander-in-chief — or the defense minister must firmly condemn China’s aggressive, provocative actions.
However, none of that happened, except for a statement from the Ministry of National Defense’s spokesman saying that “we maintain monitoring of any movement by the Chinese.”
That statement was nothing in China’s eyes.
It was not until early last month, when a pair of Chinese jets crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait, that the president condemned China. That was good, but China has already seen that President Tsai is weak. So, a few days after its jets flew over the median line, China conducted another drill involving 24 aircraft and five naval vessels near Taiwan’s waters — a move that obviously “digs deep on soft soil” (軟土深掘).
TT: After announcing that you would quit the party, Eastern Taiwan Society vice president Winston Yu (余文儀) followed suit. What has gone wrong with the DPP? What would you say is the soul of the party?
Michael Tsai: Since its founding in 1988, the DPP’s ideology has been very clear. The passage of the Taiwan independence clause in 1991 that stated its pursuit for a new and independent Taiwan has been the party’s goal.
The 1999 Resolution on Taiwan’s Future stated that the party recognized that Taiwan is already an independent, sovereign state named the Republic of China; that it advocates for a referendum on UN membership; and that the future of Taiwan must be decided by its 23 million citizens. All of that is the DPP’s soul, the party’s core values.
In our opinion, the party, chaired by Tsai Ing-wen for many years and led by her as president these past three years, has drifted from those values.
In November last year, the pro-localization camp put forward a referendum seeking to change the nation’s name from “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” at next year’s Tokyo Olympics.
We had hoped that President Tsai, who then doubled as DPP chairperson, would support the cause.
Not only did she not endorse it, she also instructed all DPP staff and officials not to petition in support of the referendum.
Why? Did those actions not increase the distance from the party’s soul? It hurts.
Over the past three years, I have been the president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance, which for 15 years has campaigned for Taiwan to join the WHO and the UN. Every year, I have requested that the president hold an international news conference to publicize Taiwan’s appeals to take part in the international organizations, but she did not want to.
The only conclusion I could reach was that she is worried about displeasing China. Why the concern?
It is hurtful to see the US Congress and former US secretary of health and human services Tom Price, as well as Japan and Canada, voice support for us, and yet our own government and legislature do nothing of the kind.
I am disappointed — what the Tsai administration is doing is drifting away from the DPP’s founding ideals.
Three batches of banana sauce imported from the Philippines were intercepted at the border after they were found to contain the banned industrial dye Orange G, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. From today through Sept. 2 next year, all seasoning sauces from the Philippines are to be subject to the FDA’s strictest border inspection, meaning 100 percent testing for illegal dyes before entry is allowed, it said in a statement. Orange G is an industrial coloring agent that is not permitted for food use in Taiwan or internationally, said Cheng Wei-chih (鄭維智), head of the FDA’s Northern Center for
LOOKING NORTH: The base would enhance the military’s awareness of activities in the Bashi Channel, which China Coast Guard ships have been frequenting, an expert said The Philippine Navy on Thursday last week inaugurated a forward operating base in the country’s northern most province of Batanes, which at 185km from Taiwan would be strategically important in a military conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The Philippine Daily Inquirer quoted Northern Luzon Command Commander Lieutenant General Fernyl Buca as saying that the base in Mahatao would bolster the country’s northern defenses and response capabilities. The base is also a response to the “irregular presence this month of armed” of China Coast Guard vessels frequenting the Bashi Channel in the Luzon Strait just south of Taiwan, the paper reported, citing a
UNDER PRESSURE: The report cited numerous events that have happened this year to show increased coercion from China, such as military drills and legal threats The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to reinforce its “one China” principle and the idea that Taiwan belongs to the People’s Republic of China by hosting celebratory events this year for the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the “retrocession” of Taiwan and the establishment of the UN, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said in its latest report to the Legislative Yuan. Taking advantage of the significant anniversaries, Chinese officials are attempting to assert China’s sovereignty over Taiwan through interviews with international news media and cross-strait exchange events, the report said. Beijing intends to reinforce its “one China” principle
A total lunar eclipse, an astronomical event often referred to as a “blood moon,” would be visible to sky watchers in Taiwan starting just before midnight on Sunday night, the Taipei Astronomical Museum said. The phenomenon is also called “blood moon” due to the reddish-orange hue it takes on as the Earth passes directly between the sun and the moon, completely blocking direct sunlight from reaching the lunar surface. The only light is refracted by the Earth’s atmosphere, and its red wavelengths are bent toward the moon, illuminating it in a dramatic crimson light. Describing the event as the most important astronomical phenomenon
RSS