Taiwanese marched with Tibetans in the rain in Taipei yesterday to mark the 60th anniversary of the 1959 Tibetan uprising against China, with organizers and politicians highlighting the contrast between freedom and democracy in Taiwan and the situation in Chinese-ruled Tibet.
The march started at the 228 Memorial Park and ended at the Nishi Honganji Relics, a reconstructed Buddhist temple complex in the Ximending (西門町) area, with participants shouting slogans including: “Tibet belongs to Tibetans,” “Chinese military get out of Tibet” and “We want to return to our homeland.”
The annual event was organized by the Taiwan Tibetan Welfare Association’s Tashi Tsering and Tenzin Namdak; Dawa Tsering, chairman of the Tibet Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama; and Regional Tibetan Youth Congress-Taiwan chairman Lobsang Tsewang, among others.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
More than 20 Taiwanese organizations took part in the event, while representatives of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Green Party-Social Democratic Party Alliance and the Free Taiwan Party attended.
No Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) representative attended.
“China has carried out repression of Tibetans for more than 60 years, but I am proud to say that Tibetans have not given up hope of returning to our homeland,” Tashi said. “Tibetans inside Tibet have never given up the goal of taking back our nation and for the return of the Dalai Lama. Tibetans living in democratic countries are also working toward these goals.”
Tashi said that the 17-point “peace agreement” signed in 1951 in Beijing between representatives of the Dalai Lama and the Chinese government needed to be remembered.
“We remind Tibetans and Taiwanese not to forget this history,” he said. “Less than 10 years after signing the agreement, the Dalai Lama had to escape from Tibet for his safety to exile in India.”
“China wrote in the agreement a promise that Tibetans could preserve and protect their language, and practice their religion and culture, but it all came to nought,” Tashi said.
DPP Secretary-General Luo Wen-jia (羅文嘉) criticized the leaders of the KMT for urging Taiwan to negotiate with Beijing and sign a peace agreement, saying that the result of the 1951 deal was Beijing’s annexation of Tibet.
“Have people not learned the lessons of history, about the bloody repression in Tibet and atrocities committed by the Chinese military 60 years ago?” Luo asked. “How can the KMT dream of talking to a tyrannical regime and asking them to guarantee peace?”
Uighur democracy advocate Wuer Kaixi said that Taiwanese must not believe the authoritarian Beijing government.
“It is foolish in the extreme for politicians in Taiwan to believe that China would keep any of its promises when signing a peace agreement,” Wuer Kaixi said.
“If Taiwan does, then Taiwanese would fall into the depth of hell and perpetual suffering,” he said.
“Taiwan today faces the same situation Tibet faced 60 years ago. A brutal Chinese regime wants to annex a neighboring country by devious means,” he said. “From our experience of promoting democracy in China, it is clear that peace cannot be guaranteed by signing an agreement.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods