Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) statement yesterday on the so-called “1992 consensus” has put the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in a hard spot, National Cheng Kung University professor Hung Ching-fu (洪敬富) said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted to making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
The KMT’s consensus was made intentionally vague, but Xi’s statement has removed that vagueness by adding the “goal of unification,” Hung said.
That placed the KMT in an awkward position, and China could, like KMT Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) had in last year’s local elections campaign, begin linking the consensus to the economy, Hung said.
Tamkang University’s Graduate School of China Studies professor Andy Chang (張五岳) agreed, saying that Xi’s statement marked a departure of the Chinese definition of the consensus from that of the KMT.
It has also affected perception of the consensus by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwanese public, Chang said.
China has adopted the method of handling the mention of the consensus on two levels, Chang said.
Should the consensus be mentioned in relation to cross-strait ties, or negotiations between high-ranking civil servants on either side, the Chinese would place more significance on the issue, he said.
However, should the consensus, or its concept, be mentioned in lower-level interactions, such as city-to-city relations, the Chinese would place less significance on the usage of the term or concept, Chang added.
This two-level handling was why Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was able to facilitate interaction with Shanghai when he said “both sides of the [Taiwan] Strait are family,” but would probably meet with failure if he were to use it in running for the presidency, Chang said..
Xi in his concluding remarks said: “It is the global consensus to maintain the one China principle, and the affairs of the Chinese should be decided by the Chinese and not by foreign powers. China’s unification will not harm any nation’s benefits, including their economic benefits in Taiwan.”
Compared with the statements made in 2008, the 30th anniversary of China’s original Letter to “Taiwanese compatriots,” Taiwan and China has no basis of mutual trust, have essentially severed their only link of communication and faces the additional difficulty of the US-China trade dispute, which is straining US-China relations while further solidifying US-Taiwan relations, Chang said.
Chang said that Xi’s comments are aimed partly at the US.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Year’s address and “Xi Five Points” are both statements to the international body and are less concerned with whether their statements would receive a positive response from each other, Chang said.
Tsai’s address had made clear the DPP administration’s stance, allowing the Taiwanese public and the international community to understand what lines the government will not cross, Chang said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods