Taiwanese are to vote in at least nine referendums alongside the nine-in-one elections on Nov. 24, but that does not mean the referendum results will necessarily be implemented, two legal experts said.
The referendums cover a broad range of issues, from the definition of marriage in the Civil Code and maintaining a ban on food imports from five prefectures in Japan imposed following the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster to changing the national sports team’s name from “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games and other international events.
At least one-quarter of eligible voters need to vote in favor of a proposal — and outnumber “no” votes — for it to pass, according to the Referendum Act (公民投票法), following amendments in December last year, when the threshold was lowered.
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
A referendum’s outcome is legally binding if it passes the threshold, Central Election Commission spokesperson Chen Chao-chien (陳朝建) said on Monday.
According to the act, if a law is repealed in a referendum, it would lose its effect on the third day after its result is officially announced by the commission.
If a referendum result calls for the enactment of new legislation, the government must submit a proposal no later than three months after the vote and the Legislative Yuan must complete its review before the next summer or winter break, the act says.
If the result of a referendum requires a change in policy, the president or the relevant authority must take steps to implement the result, the act states.
However, implementing referendum results might not be the responsibility of any government agency or official, because the act does not have compulsory enforcement clauses, the experts said.
Bruce Liao (廖元豪), an associate professor of law at National Chengchi University, said that the law does not give the public the power to directly enact legislation without action by the legislature.
Regarding referendums on policy change, the government is obliged to carry out the will of the electorate, but little can be done if government agencies fail to see a measure through, he added.
Two referendums put forward by groups opposed to same-sex marriage ask people whether they agree that marriage should be restricted to a union between a man and a woman, as stipulated in the Civil Code, and whether the protection of the rights of same-sex couples should be protected without changing the marriage regulations in the Civil Code.
A referendum question proposed by gay rights advocates asks voters whether they agree that the marriage regulations in the Civil Code should be applied to same-sex couples to guarantee their right to marriage.
The Council of Grand Justices in May last year struck down the Civil Code’s marriage regulations as unconstitutional, saying that the provisions do not allow same-sex couples to enter into permanent unions, thus violating their freedom of marriage and right to equal treatment.
The council presented the government with a two-year deadline to address the matter.
Academia Sinica associate research fellow Chiou Wen-tsong (邱文聰) said that if the proposal against gay marriage is passed, it would not affect the constitutional interpretation because of the supremacy of the Constitution, but it would complicate the process for legalizing same-sex marriage.
Opponents of gay marriage have advocated passing a special law to meet the council’s demand, rather than amending the Civil Code — a solution that gay rights groups have said would be discriminatory.
If both anti-gay marriage referendums were to pass, the groups that deem a special law discriminatory would have to seek another constitutional interpretation, Chiou said.
As for the proposal seeking to change the national sports team’s name, Chiou said that if the referendum passes, the government should try to negotiate with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in accordance with the public mandate.
The government might be criticized for violating the act or be censured by the Control Yuan if it does not try to renegotiate its agreement with the IOC, but that does not mean that it must follow through on the result at all costs, Liao said.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) yesterday reported the first case of a new COVID-19 subvariant — BA.3.2 — in a 10-year-old Singaporean girl who had a fever upon arrival in Taiwan and tested positive for the disease. The girl left Taiwan on March 20 and the case did not have a direct impact on the local community, it said. The WHO added the BA.3.2 strain to its list of Variants Under Monitoring in December last year, but this was the first imported case of the COVID-19 variant in Taiwan, CDC Deputy Director-General Lin Ming-cheng (林明誠) said. The girl arrived in Taiwan on
South Korea is planning to revise its controversial electronic arrival card, a step Taiwanese officials said prompted them to hold off on planned retaliatory measures, a South Korean media report said yesterday. A Yonhap News Agency report said that the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs is planning to remove the “previous departure place” and “next destination” fields from its e-arrival card system. The plan, reached after interagency consultations, is under review and aims to simplify entry procedures and align the electronic form with the paper version, a South Korean ministry official said. The fields — which appeared only on the electronic form
A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a bill to enhance cooperation with Taiwan on drone development and to reduce reliance on supply chains linked to China. The proposed Blue Skies for Taiwan Act of 2026 was introduced by Republican US senators Ted Cruz and John Curtis, and Democratic US senators Jeff Merkley and Andy Kim. The legislation seeks to ease constraints on Taiwan-US cooperation in uncrewed aerial systems (UAS), including dependence on China-sourced components, limited access to capital and regulatory barriers under US export controls, a news release issued by Cruz on Wednesday said. The bill would establish a "Blue UAS
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is suspending retaliation measures against South Korea that were set to take effect tomorrow, after Seoul said it is updating its e-arrival system, MOFA said today. The measures were to be a new round of retaliation after Taiwan on March 1 changed South Korea's designation on government-issued alien resident certificates held by South Korean nationals to "South Korea” from the "Republic of Korea," the country’s official name. The move came after months of protests to Seoul over its listing of Taiwan as "China (Taiwan)" in dropdown menus on its new online immigration entry system. MOFA last week
RSS