After Changhua County on Wednesday bulldozed the so-called “Chinese communism shrine,” Changhua County Commissioner Wei Ming-ku (魏明谷) yesterday said that shrine owner Wei Ming-jen (魏明仁) would have to foot the bill.
The commissioner’s comments came after celebrity Youtuber “Angela Chang” accused the government of letting Wei Ming-jen shrug off the cost of demolishing the temple’s illegal structures, which she estimated at NT$5 million (US$163,661).
Although Wei Ming-jen is embroiled in several lawsuits, the government has yet to freeze his assets or look into the sources of his funding, so the public would likely be stuck with the demolition costs, Chang said.
The Democratic Progressive Party administration should not condone Beijing supporters who threaten the public with talk of drowning Taiwan in blood with Chinese arms, she said.
Wei Ming-ku said that the Administrative Enforcement Agency should have no trouble reclaiming the expense, as the temple was built on property that belonged to people with whom he had financial ties.
The owner of an illegal building is by law responsible for paying for its demolition and the county intends to make Wei Ming-jen pay the full sum, Wei Ming-ku said.
Should Wei Ming-jen liquidate his assets or escape the jurisdiction before he pays, the county would sell the land, which is easily worth more than NT$5 million, the commissioner said.
Tearing down the illegal shrine was a matter of “defending national security and the dignity of the Taiwanese people,” he said, adding that the county aims to finish the job in a week.
The county estimates the cost of the demolition at NT$5.8 million, including NT$300,000 in police costs, but the figure is subject to revision, county Deputy Commissioner Lin Ming-yu (林明裕) said.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of