The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) invitation to former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to talk about his indictment at the party’s Central Standing Committee today is not political endorsement, but a move to clarify the issue for KMT members, committee members said yesterday.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office on Tuesday last week charged Ma with breach of trust and contraventions of the Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法) for his role in the KMT’s disposal of several party assets in 2005 and 2006, including Central Motion Picture Corp (中影), China Television Co (中視), Broadcasting Corp of China (中廣) and the old KMT headquarters building, during his time as party chairman
KMT Legislator and committee member Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華) said that many KMT members knew that the party was at the time under pressure from the amended Broadcasting and Television Act (廣播電視法) to sell the media companies.
While party members recognize the validity of Ma’s handling of the issue, it would be good for Ma to clarify the matter, Hsu said.
Committee member Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊瓔) agreed with Hsu, saying the invitation is only for Ma to clarify the case and does not pertain to political endorsement.
Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Alicia Wang (王育敏) said that reports that Ma intends to run in the 2020 presidential election in a bid to avoid prosecution is only media speculation.
Internet polls have been placing Ma alongside President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Premier William Lai (賴清德) as possible candidates for the presidential election, which means Ma still enjoys a high level of popularity, Wang said.
KMT Legislator Sufin Siluko (廖國棟) did not express any opinions on Ma’s rumored bid.
Ma’s case has already been investigated and closed by the judiciary due to a lack of evidence, and the indictment is the result of political machinations, as the Democratic Progressive Party has been trying to convict Ma, he added.
In related news, Ma’s office yesterday confirmed that Hon Hai Precision Industry Co chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) donated to Ma’s new foundation, without revealing the amount.
While the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has filed an application with the New Taipei City government stating that it would have assets amounting to NT$5 million (US$163,848), it was rumored that Gou pledged stock worth NT$68 million to the foundation.
The foundation would be the third foundation that Ma has established and is expected to begin work on Friday next week.
Ma’s office had previously said in a press release that the foundation aims to create a rational and practical platform on which matters would be debated and reforms would be discussed.
The online media outlet Up Media yesterday reported that KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) camp was unhappy with the media hype surrounding the foundation.
Ma’s recent actions are aimed at garnering public support for his legal case, a KMT source said, adding that Ma’s actions were like a “kick in the back” for Wu.
Interactions between party heavyweights and Ma at the foundation’s inauguration ceremony on Friday next week would be indicative of his standing within the party and potential support for him, the source said.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiao-kuang
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods