Leaders of several religious groups at a public hearing on Monday criticized a proposed draft act governing private foundations, saying transparency of financial information could bring harm to their donors and cause quarrels between couples.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator John Wu (吳志揚) convened the hearing on the act, which is under review by the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee.
Master Ching Yao (淨耀), president of the New Taipei City Buddhist Association, told the hearing that his group’s finances, especially those for religious activities, have always been transparent to its members and were reported to government authorities.
The association would not protest being regulated by the proposed act, but the government should give religious groups more leeway on their finances, Ching Yao said.
Religious doctrines are often far more stringent than secular laws, he added.
Master Chueh Pei (覺培), the secretary-general of the Zhonghua Buddhist Union, said discussing such issues seemed to imply that religion or religious groups were without supervision, which is slandering the name of Buddhism.
As a religion, we have a duty to protect our believers, Chueh Pei said, adding that making information on donations public could lead to donors being kidnapped and held for ransom.
Fan Ssu-yun (范思筠), honorary chairperson of Longshan Temple in Nantou County, said people are asking to borrow money from her after the temple began having to issue receipts for donations.
If all donations must be registered, she might have to file for divorce to continue helping with public welfare work so that her husband would not find out how much she is donating, Fan said.
However, financial transparency and religious freedom are separate issues, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) said.
Without a valid reason for why their finances should not be monitored, religious groups must realize that funding from the public is answerable to the public, Yu said.
The Taiwan Presbyterian Church, its churches and facilities — 1,260 in total — have always been transparent and just in the handling of their finances, Taiwan Presbyterian Church Research and Development Center director Cheng Ying-er (鄭英兒) said.
The church supports the passage of the draft bill, so all private foundations would fall under a common regulatory law.
Religious groups are unique entities in that they provide funding for education and hospitals, such as Mackay Memorial Hospital and Chang Jung Christian University, he said, suggesting that the government consider this aspect and create management loopholes for such entities for the sake of the law.
Deputy Minister of Justice Chen Ming-tang (陳明堂) said the draft act would be the common law regulating all private foundations, but that foundations regulated by the Medical Act (醫療法) and the Private School Act (私立學校法) should observe those laws first.
Whether religious groups should be excluded is up to the Legislative Yuan, he added.
Deputy Minister of the Interior Chiu Chang-yueh (邱昌嶽) said the possibility of drafting a special act for religion is being mulled, but until that time, religion and religious groups, given their unique position, should be exempted from the proposed foundation act.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods