The Ministry of Education is only “taking reform halfway” with a draft amendment to the Private School Act (私立學校法) it proposed last week that would bar high-ranking ministry officials from serving as presidents, directors or supervisors at private universities within three years of their retirement, the Taiwan Higher Education Union said yesterday.
Union members staged a protest in front of the ministry building in Taipei, accusing it of creating a loophole in the amendment.
The amendment prohibits ministry officials who have held the positions of minister, deputy minister, department of higher education director or chief secretary from taking up posts at universities.
Photo: Fang pin-chao, Taipei Times
However, it falls short of prohibiting lower-ranked officials whose work is related to higher education from assuming private university posts, which could give rise to possible corruption at private institutions, the union said.
For example, officials who previously held posts as a deputy director or a senior specialist could improperly use their influence to help the university they are working for secure more funds, it said.
The group named two former ministry officials who have recently made “seamless transitions” to private university posts, accusing them of acting as “door gods” or “guardians” for their schools.
Former deputy minister of education Chen Der-hwa (陳德華), who retired from the ministry in May after working there for 33 years, became an adjunct professor at Da-Yeh University and Hwa Hsia University of Technology in September, union organization department director Lin Po-yi (林柏儀) said.
Lin said that Chen in 2011 penned an article panning calls to gradually reduce the number of students at all universities, saying that it would be a “major disaster” for higher education.
Chen’s article advocated against reducing the gap between the number of students and lecturers, which would help universities collect more tuition fees, but would tilt the student-teacher ratio unfavorably against students, he said, adding that this is proof Chen had attempted to benefit universities.
Former Department of Technological and Vocational deputy director Jao Pang-an (饒邦安), who retired in August last year and is now the chief secretary at Takming University of Science and Technology, advocated against “directors of public interest” — objective, disinterested members of third-party organizations that recommended staff for private universities’ boards of directors to protect faculty and student rights — in an article published by the Taiwan Education Review, union secretary-general Chen Cheng-liang (陳政亮) said.
Jao could be protecting private school directors who have been involved in illegal profiteering, he said.
Ministry official Ting Hui-hsiang (丁慧翔) dismissed accusations that the ministry is insincere about the reform, calling the draft amendment the ministry’s “act of self-regulation.”
Citing Constitutional Interpretation No. 637, she said the draft amendment should not overly infringe on civil servants’ rights to work, adding that the ministry proposed the amendment after reviewing relevant provisions governing civil servants who have retired.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods