Sunflower movement activists yesterday threatened to escalate protests if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) refuses to engage in open debate over “supervisory articles” for negotiations with China, demanding that the party address flaws in its proposed draft legislation.
Protesters from about 20 civic groups gathered in front of the Legislative Yuan’s front gate, shouting their rejection of “fake” legislative supervision of negotiations with China.
“The Sunflower movement is not finished yet — we are extremely anxious about where DPP trade policy is going,” Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) said, adding that premier-designate Lin Chuan (林全) promised to move forward with the cross-strait service trade agreement and trade in goods agreement.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Lai’s organization spearheaded early opposition to the service trade agreement, which culminated in the Legislative Yuan being surrounded by protesters for three weeks during 2014’s Sunflower movement, after the main legislative chamber was occupied by student activists. Passing supervisory regulations to address opaque “black box” negotiations with China by guaranteeing legislative oversight and civic participation was a key demand of the movement.
The relatively “flexible” and “loose” version of supervisory regulations proposed by the DPP caucus — which would not be applied retroactively to past agreements or negotiations already underway — raised questions about whether they were laying a path for continuing President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) China trade policy, Lai said, calling for the DPP and New Power Party (NPP) caucuses to respond to activists’ objections within a week, and to hold open dialogues and debates over differences in opinion.
The protesters said the draft legislation was too weak to guarantee legislative supervisory powers, meaningful civil participation or rigorous review of the effect of agreements. They also criticized it for failing to include special standards for sovereignty-related negotiations and also for using language referring to Taiwan as an “area” instead of a nation.
“If the DPP intends to take a different course [from Ma’s administration], it should not use previous methods of dealing with the objections raised by civil society,” former Sunflower movement spokesman Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) said, blasting DPP legislators for allegedly claiming that activists’ objections were the result of “misunderstandings.”
“I think some of the demands are because of a lack of understanding [of DPP draft legislation] while others are because of genuine differences of opinion,” said DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), who met with protesters on behalf of the DPP caucus.
While NPP legislators Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明) accepted the protesters’ demands for open discussions and debate, Lee said his party’s caucus believed it was important to follow Legislative Yuan procedures for reviewing legislation.
“We will seek to work in opinions from all parties and invite everyone to participate in public hearings to fully express their views,” he said.
His remarks drew cries of “not satisfied” from protesters, with Lin saying that a “public hearing” would not satisfy protesters’ demands for an open debate and promising to return to “get an answer” if the DPP fails to respond within a week.
Meanwhile, Wang Puchen (王炳忠) and other protesters affiliated with the “deep-blue” New Party also showed up to “support” the activists — breaking out periodically into shouts accusing the DPP of “political fraud” for switching its position on supervisory articles.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus echoed the activists, calling on DPP chairperson and president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to apologize to the public for the party’s change of attitude.
KMT Legislator Alicia Wang (王育敏) said the DPP had a “two-state doctrine” imbedded in its past draft legislation, which put “Taiwan and China” in the name of the proposed law.
“Now it is gone, meaning a great deal has changed,” Wang said. “The party chairperson should offer an explanation and acknowledge that what she had upheld was a mistake. Should she not apologize to the KMT and the Executive Yuan for what she has done?”
Wang called on the activists and civil groups that participated in the Sunflower movement to “use the same standard that they had for overseeing the Ma administration to oversee the incoming government led by Tsai.”
KMT Legislator Chang Li-shan (張麗善) seconded Wang’s remarks, calling on the Appendectomy Project organizers — who had called for the recall of the incompetent lawmakers who were mainly, but not limited to, KMT members — to take the axe to the DPP lawmakers as well.
Additional reporting by Alison Hsiao
TENSE SITUATION: If the storm does not bring rain, Taiwan might have to wait until next month amid water scarcity in the center and south, an expert said Typhoon Surigae is to bring rain to the nation’s east coast and mountainous areas in central and southern Taiwan from Wednesday to Friday, the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) said yesterday. As of 2pm yesterday, the typhoon’s center was 1,170km southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost tip. The radius of the storm was 280km, and it was moving northwest at 9kph, with a maximum wind speed of 198kph. The bureau forecasts that the storm would switch to a northerly direction when approaching the east coast of Luzon Island in the Philippines on Wednesday, CWB forecaster Lin Ding-yi (林定宜) said, adding that Surigae would
SEEKING CLARITY: Some members of the US delegation asked KMT legislators in a meeting to address their party’s position on the so-called ‘1992 consensus,’ sources said A US delegation tasked by US President Joe Biden to reaffirm the country’s commitment to its partnership with Taiwan yesterday wrapped up a three-day visit to Taipei. Former US senator Chris Dodd, former US deputy secretaries of state Richard Armitage and James Steinberg, and US Department of State Office of Taiwan Coordination Director Dan Biers departed at 11:20am on a private jet. The members of the delegation, all friends of Biden, arrived on Wednesday and met with President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and other government officials. During the three-day visit, the delegation also met with six members of the Legislative
Taipei’s street names should reflect a “Taiwanese spirit,” Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said in an online video released yesterday, in which he asked why many of them are named after locations in China. In a three-minute video uploaded to a Facebook page called “Taiwanese Uncle Ko Wen-je” (台灣阿北柯文哲), the mayor suggested changing the names of Taipei streets. The page’s banner was a photograph of Ko on Jade Mountain’s (玉山) main peak. The page was closed at about noon, about four hours after it was made public. Ko said that street names in the capital named “Ningxia,” “Tibet,” “Beiping” — an old name for
‘AN EXCUSE’: The intent of Beijing’s incursions was ‘intimidation and coercion,’ a senior US official said, adding that China was using the US to justify its actions Chinese carrier drills and stepped-up incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone in the past few weeks are meant to send a message to Washington to stand down and back off, security sources in Taipei said. The increased activity — which China, unusually, described as “combat drills” on Wednesday — has raised alarm in both Taipei and Washington, although security officials do not see it as a sign of an imminent attack. Rather, at least some of the exercises are practicing “access denial” maneuvers to prevent foreign forces from coming to Taipei’s defense in a war, one official familiar with Taiwan’s security