Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) yesterday proposed placing political talks on the cross-strait agenda to relieve the bottleneck holding up development of cross-strait relations and to ensure that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are on an equal political footing.
During a radio interview yesterday, Hung, branded by some as a “radical pro-unification advocate,” clarified the “one China, common interpretation” policy she has proposed in lieu of the so-called “1992 consensus” — a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means, which President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) claims was reached by the two sides in Hong Kong in 1992.
Instead of Taiwan and China each having their own interpretation of what “one China” means, Hung has proposed that both sides have a “common interpretation.”
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
One reason supporting a “common interpretation” is that “[Beijing] has never recognized our existence,” Hung said.
“[The purpose of] ‘one China, common interpretation’ is to demand that Beijing recognize the fact that the Republic of China [ROC] government exists,” she added.
Hung described her proposal as an “advanced version of the ‘1992 consensus.’”
The cross-strait relationship has advanced well with adherence to the “1992 consensus” under the Ma administration, as evidenced by the signing of 21 agreements over past years, but it has recently experienced a “bottleneck,” Hung said.
The development of cross-strait relations has been held up by qualms that economic benefits generated have been reaped by certain groups and not shared with the public, and that “political reconciliation did not occur,” Hung said.
She added that the delay to the ratification of a cross-strait service trade agreement, caused by the Sunflower movement in March and April last year, has “affected mutual trust.”
Relieving the bottleneck would require that both sides move into a “deep-water zone” to address “our political status,” otherwise the definition of what the cross-strait relationship is would remain shrouded in ambiguity, Hung said.
“Is [Beijing] not saying that the two sides [of the Taiwan Strait] are like a family? I have to say, it is not a relationship between father and son, but a relationship between brothers,” she said. “We care about equality and dignity.”
In addition to the demand that the existence of the ROC government be recognized, Hung said she would also press Beijing to ensure peaceful development of relations by asking China to guarantee it will not use military force against Taiwan.
Although the first half of “one China, common interpretation” is based on the “one China” principle, Hung said, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) claiming sovereignty over Taiwan would be an “overly broad interpretation.”
“We continue to oppose the claim that Taiwan is part of the PRC. We do not agree that the ROC forfeited its sovereignty [to the PRC since 1949]. We oppose the use of force to resolve cross-strait issues and any attempts to alter [the ROC] Constitution and the [Taiwanese] way of life,” Hung said.
Hung said she rejected the “pro-unification” label, because she is “pro-ROC.”
Hung said it is immoral to label her as “pro-unification,” especially after she proposed “one China, common interpretation” and a cross-strait peace agreement, because such an accord would be contingent on the principles she has outlined.
Separately, Hung approved of the comments by former minister of foreign affairs Cheng Chien-jen (程建人), one of her diplomatic advisers, who said the likelihood of Hung visiting Washington to exchange views with the US over her cross-strait policies has “fallen to its lowest point.”
“You could say that, but that does not mean that I do not value the relationship between the US and Taiwan or that I do not understand how important the US is to Taiwan,” Hung said, when asked to comment on the issue.
Hung said her team would factor in whether a trip to the US would be in the best interests of the nation and her campaign schedule before a final decision is made.
The US would understand, as the election would be less than half a year away after the party formally endorses her nomination next month, she added.
Hung acknowledged she made “improper” remarks last week in response to an invitation extended by American Institute in Taiwan Director Kin Moy for her to visit Washington and her rebuttal of KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) claim that such a trip would be possible in August or September.
The deputy legislative speaker said she sometimes talks in a “frivolous” manner and in a “light” tone, but she acknowledged that her comments were “improper” as she is now a potential presidential candidate.
Chu later tried to downplay the discrepancy between him and Hung over whether Hung visiting the US is necessary.
“We are moving in the same direction. Along the way, we all know that sometimes we bite our tongues. There is no right or wrong in this case. We are all working hard to win everyone’s support,” Chu said.
NATIONAL SECURITY: Authorities are working to confirm the identities of the military personnel involved and investigating possible illegal conduct and regulatory violations Authorities are probing possible national security implications after Kinmen police and immigration officers on Sunday found a Chinese woman allegedly posing as a tourist while engaging in prostitution involving more than 10 military personnel. The woman, surnamed Chen (陳), has since been deported, authorities said, adding that investigators are still working to confirm the identities of those implicated, as the records only listed code names and aliases. The case stemmed from a report received by the Kinmen District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday last week from the Jinhu Precinct of the Kinmen County Police Bureau. On Sunday, police, along with the National Immigration
GLOBALGIVING: ‘ Caving to external pressure is not acceptable for an organization that has cultivated justice reform and human rights for 30 years,’ one NGO said A slew of non-government organizations (NGOs) have withdrawn from the GlobalGiving fundraising platform after it announced it would use “Chinese Taipei” instead of “Taiwan” from next month. The Taiwan Good Rice Association wrote on Facebook on Friday that it was informed on April 28 via a teleconference call of the change, which was made because the platform wanted to operate in China. Taiwan Good Rice is to terminate all cooperative relationships with GlobalGiving in response to the platform’s “unilateral and non-negotiable” decision to remove references to Taiwan, the NGO said. “Taiwan is in the official name of Taiwan Good Rice Association and the
STAY COOL: The HPA recommended that people stay hydrated, use air-conditioning or fans while indoors, wear loose-fitting clothes and walk in the shade while outdoors Employers must implement measures such as installing cooling equipment, and providing drinking water and rest breaks for outdoor workers starting from Monday next week, the Taipei Department of Labor said on Sunday. Employers who fail to comply could face fines of NT$30,000 to NT$300,000 under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (職業安全衛生法), the department said. Businesses in Taipei employing fewer than 100 workers, as well as registered self-employed workers with labor insurance coverage, could receive on-site assessments and guidance from occupational safety consultants to help them apply for central government subsidies to implement or improve heat-protection measures, it said. Under the Ministry of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday briefed her party’s Central Standing Committee regarding her scheduled visit to the US between Monday next week and June 16, saying that her purpose would be to persuade the US that the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution was a “one China” constitution that would foster stable and peaceful cross-strait relations. The ROC Constitution is the most important defense for all Taiwanese citizens, as it upholds our democracy and has contributed to our robust economy, which aligns with international and US interests, she said. “We would not be troublemakers and drag the US under,”