Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that she would develop cross-strait ties according to the constitutional framework of the Republic of China (ROC) if she wins next year’s presidential election, the party said yesterday.
“Tsai has made it very clear that she will continue to push for peaceful and stable development across the Taiwan Strait based on public opinion and the fruits accumulated from cross-strait exchanges over the past two decades under the framework of the ROC constitutional system,” DPP spokesperson Cheng Yun-peng (鄭運鵬) said.
“We will make sure that Taiwan remains democratic and can make decisions on its own, and that cross-strait exchanges are democratic and transparent,” Cheng said.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Cheng made the remarks following criticism from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光), who said Tsai, in a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) during her US visit this month, failed to mention the “most important issue at the core” of cross-strait ties.
“Opposing Taiwanese independence and insisting on the [so-called] 1992 consensus are the basis of peaceful developments in cross-strait relations,” Ma told a press conference in Beijing earlier yesterday. “The core value is to agree that mainland China and Taiwan both belong to one China, and cross-strait relations are not nation-to-nation relations.”
“The DPP should clearly define what cross-strait relations are,” he added.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that both Taiwan and China acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
In 2006, then-KMT lawmaker Su Chi (蘇起) said that he created the term in 2000, when he was Mainland Affairs Council chairman.
Ma said that the “1992 consensus” should not be narrowly defined as a consensus accepted by the KMT and the CCP, and is not an “abstract concept or a historical term.”
“The term represents the basic attitude of both sides on the one China principle. It is because of this basic attitude that both sides are able to allow for differences while pursuing the same goals, as well as setting aside disputes to commence discussions,” Ma said.
Any changes to the core spirit of the “1992 consensus” removes any valid basis to the peaceful and stable development of cross-strait relations, Ma said, adding that the DPP must clearly respond and define what cross-strait relations are, on what basis such relations are carried out, and how peaceful and stable development should be maintained.
Ma also panned the US government and said its actions were not conducive toward the peaceful and stable development of ties across the strait.
The US should hold to the “one China” policy and their recognition of the principles behind the three communiques, Ma said, adding that “the US should not be sending the wrong signals to Taiwanese independence forces.”
THE CHINA CONNECTION: As Beijing’s aggression increases, so does Taiwanese consciousness, making a new constitution imperative, Hsu Wei-chun said If the nation is to ratify a new constitution, it must first end any illusions about the current document’s relevance to Taiwan, an academic told a forum in Taipei yesterday. For the constitutional revisionist movement to succeed, it needs public enthusiasm, the right timing and a clear plan of action, Chung Yuan Christian University associate professor Hsu Wei-chun (徐偉群) told attendees at the event titled “Imagining a New Constitution for a New Era,” which was organized by the National Taiwan University Graduate Student Association. The Constitution exists under the “one China” framework and has little relevance to Taiwan, Hsu said, adding that
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday urged Beijing to respect the median line of the Taiwan Strait by immediately stopping its military intimidation of Taiwan, as such actions would only hurt the feelings of Taiwanese. Beijing should immediately stop making military provocations against Taiwan, Ma wrote on Facebook after Chinese warplanes in the past week have made numerous forays across the median line that divides the Taiwan Strait. Although it has never officially acknowledged the median line, Beijing used to respect it, Ma said in response to comments on Monday by Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌), who said
IDENTITY: The time is right to press on with a referendum, as the nation has heightened visibility and support in the global community, the Taiwan United Nations Alliance said The Taiwan United Nations Alliance yesterday said that it is considering launching a petition for a referendum proposal to have the nation join the UN under the name “Taiwan.” Alliance chairman Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲) was joined at a news conference in Taipei by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Huang Hsiu-fang (黃秀芳) and leaders of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and civic organizations. They said that it is the right time for a petition because Taiwan’s visibility on the world stage has increased, as it has been praised for its success in containing its COVID-19 outbreak and for helping other countries by sharing
An advertisement displayed in the corridor of the underground Taipei City Mall has caused contention online with social media users saying that it depicts Taiwanese bears as servants of Chinese pandas. The advertisement — which imitates the style of an ancient Chinese painting, but replaces people with bears — shows a scene in imperial China, with Formosan black bears laboring, while pandas relax and enjoy beverages. “The development of the tourism industry is important, but this type of targeted advertising is extremely disrespectful — and it makes people uncomfortable,” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City Councilor Chen E-jun (陳怡君) said. The advertisement, under