Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Saturday night listed six reasons to keep the death penalty, while KMT Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) responded negatively to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) call for the abolition of capital punishment to become a universal value.
The killing of an eight-year-old girl has enraged the nation and some politicians have weighed in on the debate over the abolition of death penalty.
Hung said she supports capital punishment because “calls to abolish the death penalty have blind spots.”
“First, there is no way the state can refrain entirely from killing people. Which country could keep every life sacrosanct and not kill a single person?” Hung asked.
For example, a police officer who is compelled to shoot a person who is threatening lives cannot consider how that person has been psychologically affected by childhood issues or discrimination,” Hung said.
Hung asked whether those who want the death penalty abolished also oppose weapons manufacturing.
“Nations that have abolished the death penalty, including Germany, France, Britain and Sweden, are all among the top 10 advanced weapons exporters,” Hung said.
“Not to mention that some of them have nuclear weapons,” she added.
“Even some people convicted of capital crimes ask for their own execution, so is abolition really necessary?” she asked.
Hung said families affected by murderers need to see fairness and justice.
“That concept offsets opposition to the death penalty by people who say nobody deserves to die,” Hung said.
Meanwhile, Alex Tsai responded to comments by Tsai Ing-wen, who once said the abolition of capital punishment should become a universal value.
“To hell with her idea of universal values,” Alex Tsai said on Facebook.
He said he once proposed legislation that would impose a mandatory death sentence on anyone who is convicted of murder committed in a random manner, “but few lawmakers dared sign the proposal.”
“There are two reasons for that,” Alex Tsai said.
“First, the DPP’s party charter calls for the death penalty to be abolished,” he said.
“DPP legislators worship white people’s values. Europeans push for the death penalty to be abolished and the DPP deems it a universal value,” he said. “I went to the best universities in the world [Harvard and Columbia], but I never accepted those ideas.”
“The DPP is just lazy, worshiping some white people’s evil gods,” he added.
“Second, KMT lawmakers were afraid that the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty would have asked a bunch of students to harass anyone who signed the proposal,” Alex Tsai said.
DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康), who opposes the death penalty, said the KMT and Alex Tsai have “seized on an opportunity to put salt in a wound, taking advantage of a girl’s death to fan the flames of a political feud.”
“When [President] Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) touted his ratification of two UN human rights conventions, it was tantamount to a declaration that Taiwan would progress toward the abolishment of death penalty,” Tuan said.
“The DPP leadership’s position is that the government should continue to incorporate the conventions into domestic regulations, which was a promise made by the KMT administration in 2009,” Tuan added.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods