The President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration’s strong response to exhibition posters that omitted the word “national” from the name of the National Palace Museum smacks of double standards and may be an attempt to pander to China, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers said.
Selected artifacts from the National Palace Museum are to be exhibited as part of Treasured Masterpieces from the National Palace Museum, Taipei at the Tokyo Museum from Tuesday to Sept. 15, and at the Kyushu National Museum from Oct. 7 to Nov. 30.
The Taiwanese museum said that posters referring to the “Palace Museum, Taipei” were a violation of the agreement between Taiwan and Japan in which the museum’s full name must be used in all publicity materials.
The posters in question were prepared by a media group that operates major media outlets, including the Asahi Shimbun, TV stations and other newspapers.
However, official posters and brochures prepared by the Tokyo National Museum itself refer to the museum by its full name of “National Palace Museum.”
DPP lawmakers said that in 2009 when then-museum director Chou Kung-shin (周功鑫) visited China, the Mainland Affairs Council and the Executive Yuan had said the official name for the museum at all times was the “National Palace Museum” to ensure Taiwanese rights, the legislators said.
However, the museum’s own report filed after Chou returned from China backed down from this stance, the legislators said.
The 12th page of the report listed “setting aside political disputes and increasing cultural interaction” as a desired result and said that both sides had decided to temporarily set aside the dispute regarding the museum’s title as well as relevant laws forbidding seizure of cultural artifacts, the lawmakers said.
DPP legislators also said that museum director Feng Ming-chu (馮明珠) had not protested when she saw the same omission while attending an academic seminar in China in November last year.
According to DPP Legislator Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), the Japanese government has run the risk of offending China, with whom Japan has held official diplomatic ties since 1972, by passing the Open Promotion of Overseas Artworks Act in the Japanese Diet.
The act granted Taiwan full jurisdictional authority over the loaned works for the exhibition, Lin said.
Jumping straight to threats to cancel the exhibition, without first contacting the Japanese government, has the potential to severely cripple Taiwan-Japan relations and benefit China, Lin said.
China does not want the museum relics and works exhibited in Japan, Lin said, adding that the response and its timing — one week before China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) is to arrive in Taiwan — smacked of pandering to China.
“We did not see Ma speak up when the museum’s director failed to complain about the omission of the word during her visit to China,” Lin said.
DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) added: “While Ma’s tough stance was welcomed by Taiwanese, his departure from past practice smacks of double standards.”
“Is it truly defending Taiwan’s sovereignty when we bow and scrape to China’s whims, while taking a tough stance against Japan?” the legislator said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) spokesman Charles Chen (陳以信) yesterday said the KMT supported the Ma administration’s tough stance against Japan.
Chen criticized the DPP for “bending its own position” on Taiwanese sovereignty when it came to Japan, adding that the DPP has no right to be pointing fingers.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiao-kuang
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on