Response to the “broad one-China framework” proposed by former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-te (施明德) and former National Security Council secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起) from the major political parties, academia and the Presidential Office has been at best lukewarm and non-committal, if not openly critical.
DPP spokesman Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said the party would respect the plurality of thought in a liberal society, adding however that Taiwan’s future must be decided by its 23 million nationals.
Newly elected DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) office spokesperson Hung Yao-fu (洪耀福) said similar ideas were raised in the past and the resurfacing of such comments highlighted the lack of unified national consensus on cross-strait affairs.
“We hope to achieve a national consensus on the subject through transparent and democratic means in the future,” Hung said.
Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) criticized the idea as “the repackaging of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) ‘ultimate unification.’”
Whether one called the policy “broad one China” or “narrow one China” (小一中), the People’s Republic of China is regarded as the sole legal representative of China by the international community, Huang said.
Taiwanese are against the “one China” policy and repackaging the policy under a new name would receive no better treatment, Huang said.
China is to blame for all the animosity in cross-strait affairs as Taiwan had abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) under then-acting president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) in 1991, while China enacted the anti-secession law in 2004, Huang said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) spokesman Charles Chen (陳以信) said the KMT and the Ma administration’s view on the matter was based on the Republic of China Constitution and “one China, with different interpretations” (一中各表), adding that any sort of dialogue on cross-strait affairs was good, regardless of whether the ideas conformed to the KMT’s stance.
Presidential Office spokesperson Yin Wei (殷瑋) said the president hoped to maintain the “status quo” and the “three noes” policy — no unification, no independence, no use of force (不統, 不獨, 不武) — brought up during his presidential election campaign prior to 2008.
National Chengchi University (NCCU) professor Tung Chen-yuan (童振源) said that according to today’s announcement, both of the major political parties have achieved consensus on cross-strait issues, but it remained up to China whether such a viewpoint is acceptable.
Meanwhile, Chinese democracy activist Wang Dan (王丹) said on Facebook that he did not understand what “China” in the “broad one-China framework” meant.
No specifics were given and until further information clarifying such a concept, it is not a new concept, Wang said.
A year-long renovation of Taipei’s Bangka Park (艋舺公園) began yesterday, as city workers fenced off the site and cleared out belongings left by homeless residents who had been living there. Despite protests from displaced residents, a city official defended the government’s relocation efforts, saying transitional housing has been offered. The renovation of the park in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華), near Longshan Temple (龍山寺), began at 9am yesterday, as about 20 homeless people packed their belongings and left after being asked to move by city personnel. Among them was a 90-year-old woman surnamed Wang (王), who last week said that she had no plans
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
RSS