A letter by an American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) board member alleging that the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) motive in supporting the “illegal occupation” of the legislature by the so-called “Sunflower student movement” is for political gains in upcoming elections, and which challenges as undemocratic the party’s history of physically blocking legislative proceedings, has raised discussion in political circles and the media.
David Brown, a professor at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies and former US foreign service officer, wrote the letter to the Nelson Report, a Washington daily newsletter, in response to a letter by DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), which was also published in the newsletter.
Both the AIT and the US Department of State dismissed Brown’s letter as an expression of personal views.
Photo: Lin Cheng-kung, Taipei Times
In her English-language letter, the DPP legislator explained the background of the student movement and the actions taken by the students and the government.
Hsiao “conveniently omits the DPP’s record of obstruction of Legislative Yuan consideration of the agreement,” Brown wrote, adding that the DPP encouraged members to support the students’ illegal occupation to protect Taiwan’s democracy.
“But if it is about democracy, is the DPP’s repeated physical blocking of Legislative Yuan action democratic?” Brown wrote.
“The DPP’s problem is that the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT], divided as it is, has a Legislative Yuan majority, and the DPP will go to whatever lengths are necessary to block the majority when their key interests are involved or when it suits the DPP’s election mobilization goals to exploit issues for political advantage,” he wrote.
US citizens “would not permit such obstruction to occur in the [US] Congress, and we would not view the DPP’s obstruction tactics as legitimate democratic action,” he said.
The professor wrote that he suspected the DPP was engaging in the controversy surrounding the cross-strait service trade pact and the student protest to draw support before the year-end elections.
Several media outlets have picked up the news and reported that the US government “has given the DPP the cold shoulder” in its attempt to seek US support for the student protest movement.
In response, Hsiao said that she wrote the open letter on Tuesday for overseas inquiries about the student movement, in particular about the students’ occupation of the Executive Yuan compound and the police crackdown.
“Whether the letter was biased is something I’ll leave for the public to decide,” Hsiao said.
The AIT distanced itself from Brown’s comments.
“David Brown was expressing his own opinion, not that of AIT. The US continues to believe that these issues should be resolved civilly and peacefully. Other questions about the extent of demonstrations and any expectations about their future course are more properly directed to the Taiwan authorities,” AIT spokesperson Mark Zimmer said in an e-mail.
At a press conference yesterday, DPP representative to the US Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said Brown and the US officials have stressed that the letter was Brown’s personal opinion, and Washington’s official position had been clearly defined by US Department of State spokesperson Marie Harf in a press briefing on Monday last week.
“We certainly support Taiwan’s vibrant democracy, which allows for this kind of robust political dialogue on a range of issues. The agreement on cross-strait trade in services that I think you’re referencing is an issue for Taiwan to decide. We hope that the discussion can be conducted peacefully and civilly,” Harf told the briefing.
“If Professor Brown failed to understand a series of incidents of misgovernment, among them land seizures in Dapu District (大埔), Miaoli County; the laid-off-workers controversy and the death of an army corporal, and tried to smear the DPP as engaging in election mobilization, it would be an insult to the awakening of the civil society in Taiwan and to the 500,000 people who attended the mass rally on Sunday,” Wu said.
TREATMENT OF UGANDANS: Chung Chou University of Science and Technology was ‘involved in a major breach of relevant regulations,’ the Ministry of Education said Chung Chou University of Science and Technology has been banned from accepting international students after it was found to have mistreated students from Uganda, the Ministry of Education said yesterday. The plight of students from the East African nation was exposed after online news site The Reporter uncovered illegal practices at the university in Yuanlin City, Changhua County. While students were promised English-language courses, scholarships and paid internship opportunities before they arrived, the report said that the university did not provide the scholarships and only a few courses were taught in English. The so-called “paid internship opportunities” were in reality blue-collar
CONFLICT: Memorials to Chiang Kai-shek are defended even by some of those who suffered under his rule, as they give him credit for bringing prosperity to Taiwan Fred Chin fumbles with the combination lock on an old metal gate, the bright turquoise marred by rust spots and grime. On the other side is a long dark corridor and rows of cells. It was here that Chin was detained, tried and sentenced to 12 years in an offshore jail by the totalitarian regime that ruled Taiwan for almost 40 years. “In one-and-a-half years I left this room four times,” the now 72-year-old said, gesturing to the whitewashed walls. “Three times for court, and the last time when I was sent to Green Island (綠島). Three-hundred sixty-five days a year,
RULES TIGHTENED: Passengers arriving from Sydney and Los Angeles tested positive for COVID-19, while passengers arriving from Seattle all tested negative Seventeen of the 217 passengers who arrived on long-haul at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport yesterday morning tested positive for COVID-19, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said, adding that the positivity rate was higher than expected. Yesterday was the first day that the government enforced stricter health guidelines for the testing of passengers arriving on long-haul flights. They must undergo a polymerase chain reaction test immediately after arriving at the nation’s international airports. Those who test positive are sent directly to hospitals to avoid spreading the virus to people working in and around the airports and at quarantine hotels. Victor Wang (王必勝),
‘NEW YEAR GIFT’: While the MAC called the song propaganda, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said that it addressed the homesickness of ‘Taiwanese compatriots’ A pro-unification pop song aired on Chinese television earlier this month would only further sour Taiwanese sentiment toward China, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said on Wednesday. The music video for We Sing the Same Song (我們同唱一首歌), which aired on China Central Television, features Chinese artists performing alongside Taiwanese singers Jam Hsiao (蕭敬騰), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Chen Li-nong (陳立農). The lyrics were reportedly written by Taiwanese lyricist Vincent Fang (方文山), known for his collaborations with Jay Chou (周杰倫), to music composed by a Chinese musician. Sung in Chinese and Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), the song is about three Taiwanese siblings who