Activists yesterday sought legal remedy over the controversial high-school curriculum guideline adjustments to defend “the people’s right to know” against the Ministry of Education’s refusal to reveal its decisionmaking process.
The public’s right to know must be guaranteed, Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR) secretary-general Tsai Chi-hsun (蔡季勳) said.
“It’s a jihad to demand disclosure of government information,” Tsai added.
The TAHR, Taiwan Democracy Watch and other groups yesterday filed an administrative appeal with the Ministry of Education after it rejected their request that all information related to its decision to revise the high-school curriculum on Chinese literature and social sciences be made available to the public.
The ministry promulgated the new curriculum guidelines on Feb. 10, in defiance of widespread concerns over what opponents said was an opaque decisionmaking process involving no professionals with a background in Taiwanese history and a shift to a more China-oriented historical perspective.
According to Article 6 of the Freedom of Government Information Act (政府資訊公開法), government agencies are required to disclose relevant information on administrative measures related to people’s rights and interests in a timely manner, the TAHR said in a letter to the ministry, requesting that it follow the law.
Yet the ministry turned down the request, saying that the information was among several categories of material restricted from disclosure under Article 18 of the Freedom of Government Information Law, she said.
Tsai said the ministry cited Paragraph 3 of the article because it considered the requested information as “drafts for internal use or other preparatory works conducted before the government makes a decision.”
Yet given that the new curriculum was already promulgated, the requested information can no longer be counted as for internal use or for other preparatory work, she said.
Tsai said that the move to seek legal remedy was also aimed at deterring government agencies from abusing the Freedom of Government Information Law.
The law was enacted to bring transparency to government operations and broaden public participation in democratic processes, Tsai said, adding that the spirit enshrined in the law should be followed.
The ministry yesterday reiterated its position that it was bound by Paragraph 3 of Article 18 of the act not to agree to the request.
The views of people with whom the government consults for policymaking should not be made public to ensure that those individuals can speak freely, the ministry said, citing Paragraph 2 of the article and ruling No. 579 handed down by the Supreme Court in 2010.
After the ministry receives the appeal, the case will be reviewed by the Petition and Appeal Commission under the ministry to examine the complaint.
Tsai said that they will bring the case before an administrative court if the ministry’s Petition and Appeal Committee rejects the appeal.
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS