Activists yesterday sought legal remedy over the controversial high-school curriculum guideline adjustments to defend “the people’s right to know” against the Ministry of Education’s refusal to reveal its decisionmaking process.
The public’s right to know must be guaranteed, Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR) secretary-general Tsai Chi-hsun (蔡季勳) said.
“It’s a jihad to demand disclosure of government information,” Tsai added.
The TAHR, Taiwan Democracy Watch and other groups yesterday filed an administrative appeal with the Ministry of Education after it rejected their request that all information related to its decision to revise the high-school curriculum on Chinese literature and social sciences be made available to the public.
The ministry promulgated the new curriculum guidelines on Feb. 10, in defiance of widespread concerns over what opponents said was an opaque decisionmaking process involving no professionals with a background in Taiwanese history and a shift to a more China-oriented historical perspective.
According to Article 6 of the Freedom of Government Information Act (政府資訊公開法), government agencies are required to disclose relevant information on administrative measures related to people’s rights and interests in a timely manner, the TAHR said in a letter to the ministry, requesting that it follow the law.
Yet the ministry turned down the request, saying that the information was among several categories of material restricted from disclosure under Article 18 of the Freedom of Government Information Law, she said.
Tsai said the ministry cited Paragraph 3 of the article because it considered the requested information as “drafts for internal use or other preparatory works conducted before the government makes a decision.”
Yet given that the new curriculum was already promulgated, the requested information can no longer be counted as for internal use or for other preparatory work, she said.
Tsai said that the move to seek legal remedy was also aimed at deterring government agencies from abusing the Freedom of Government Information Law.
The law was enacted to bring transparency to government operations and broaden public participation in democratic processes, Tsai said, adding that the spirit enshrined in the law should be followed.
The ministry yesterday reiterated its position that it was bound by Paragraph 3 of Article 18 of the act not to agree to the request.
The views of people with whom the government consults for policymaking should not be made public to ensure that those individuals can speak freely, the ministry said, citing Paragraph 2 of the article and ruling No. 579 handed down by the Supreme Court in 2010.
After the ministry receives the appeal, the case will be reviewed by the Petition and Appeal Commission under the ministry to examine the complaint.
Tsai said that they will bring the case before an administrative court if the ministry’s Petition and Appeal Committee rejects the appeal.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all