The founding members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have had different goals for both the future of the party and Taiwan from the day the DPP was established — Sept. 28, 1986. This was the reflection of several founding members in a book documenting the party’s establishment and at a ceremony to launch the book yesterday.
The diversity of DPP members’ political ideology could be regarded as a natural phenomenon, considering the political atmosphere of the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) — period before the party was born, said Chen Yi-shen (陳儀深) Academia Sinica research fellow and chief editor of Oral History of the DPP, in which 15 politicians and political advocates are interviewed about the party’s establishment and early days.
“At the time, the DPP was the collection of a group of anti-Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] dissidents that included people with many ideologies, including both Taiwan independence and unification. Their one similarity was their advocacy of freedom and democracy,” Chen said.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
Once the DPP resolved to support Taiwan independence, the unificationists left, and the issue of the party’s China policy cam to the fore and remains hotly debated within the party.
Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), who is known as a moderate on China policy, said in his interview that the DPP should recognize the Republic of China (ROC) and the ROC Constitution and use them as the foundation for fostering better ties with Beijing.
Hsieh, who proposed the party’s name in 1986, was also quoted as saying that adaptation was needed for a return to power and that if the DPP failed to win the presidential election in 2016, the party could become completely marginalized and “disappear.”
Ju Gao-jeng (朱高正), one of the 15 interviewees, was quoted in the book as saying that promoting Taiwan independence had been “the biggest mistake” in the history of the DPP. Ju, who was known for his physical confrontation with KMT politicians when he served as DPP lawmaker, eventually left the party in 1990 and has engaged extensively with Beijing in recent years.
However, there were DPP founding members who stood on the opposite side of the spectrum, including former premier Yu Shyi-kun (游錫堃).
Yu, who was also interviewed in the book, said on the sidelines of the book launch yesterday that the DPP’s biggest problem was “the lack of the courage to say out loud what it supported — be it Taiwan independence or normalization of the country” and that this failing could alienate voters.
Meanwhile, Yu warned that the DPP “is looking in the wrong direction” in terms of its future, arguing that winning majority in the Legislative Yuan would be more important than winning the presidential election.
Citing the DPP’s time in power, Yu said the legislature was the final decisionmaker of national policy, adding that the effort to cultivate grassroots organizations would help the party in the presidential election.
Former DPP lawmaker Lin Cho-shui (林濁水), a founding member known for his advocacy and exposition of Taiwan independence, observed that the basic structure for cross-strait relations in the next 20 years have been set, with the DPP and the KMT enjoying advantages in different aspects.
“The DPP would be trusted to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty and distribute wealth fairly while most people believe the KMT is better at maintaining cross-strait stability and economic exchanges. That won’t change in the next 20 years,” Lin said.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
Taiwan is doing everything it can to prevent a military conflict with China, including building up asymmetric defense capabilities and fortifying public resilience, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) said in a recent interview. “Everything we are doing is to prevent a conflict from happening, whether it is 2027 or before that or beyond that,” Hsiao told American podcaster Shawn Ryan of the Shawn Ryan Show. She was referring to a timeline cited by several US military and intelligence officials, who said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready to take military action against Taiwan
RSS