Thu, Aug 08, 2013 - Page 3 News List

Groups plan anti-nuclear drive

POWER NUMBERS:More than 100 civic groups hope to get more than 10 million people to vote against the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in a proposed referendum

By Lee I-chia  /  Staff reporter

Members of the National Anti-Nuke Action Platform and 50 other anti-nuclear groups yesterday hold a joint press conference on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei announcing the launch of a series of anti-nuclear activities across the nation.

Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times

More than 100 civic groups yesterday announced that they are planning to recruit more than 100,000 people as “vote brokers” to stop construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant if the issue is put to a vote in a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-proposed referendum.

Making a joint announcement in front of the Presidential Office in Taipei, group representatives urged the Cabinet to abort construction of the facility in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Gongliao Dictrict (貢寮).

“We will not give up until use of nuclear power [in Taiwan] is abolished,” Citizen of the Earth, Taiwan (CET) executive director Lee Ken-cheng (李根政) said.

The groups are set to initiate an anti-nuclear civic network project that will include anti-nuclear shops and anti-nuclear vote brokers, he said.

Shop owners can participate by hanging anti-nuclear flags in their stores, setting up a display of anti-nuclear brochures, or holding public events, Lee said.

Through these measures, customers will have better access to relevant nuclear energy information and have more exposure to the issue, he added.

The anti-nuclear vote brokers would devote their efforts to drumming up referendum votes against the plant and would also pressure the government to bring a halt to the project before the plebiscite, as well as urging lawmakers to retract their support of the proposed referendum, Lee said.

“We hope we can solicit more than 10 million votes against completing the plant through 100,000 vote brokers,” he said.

The KMT-proposed referendum would ask the public whether it agrees that construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be stopped and that it should not be allowed to operate. Critics insist the project should be scrapped without the poll, which they say is dishonest because the threshold of voter turnout stipulated by law to achieve a “yes” vote, and for the referendum to be valid, is unreasonably high.

“The public can no longer accept how the government is trying to use the referendum to draw attention away from the broader issues of nuclear safety or investigating the responsibility of governmental officials for the poor quality construction of the power plant,” Green Citizens’ Action Alliance secretary-general Tsuei Su-hsin (崔愫欣) said.

Tsuei said they also urge lawmakers to form a special investigative task force to reveal the truth about five important aspects of the nation’s nuclear power plants: the safety of the three operational nuclear power plants; the real costs of nuclear energy; who is responsible for the Gongliao plant’s budget and quality; how to deal with nuclear waste; and the risks and consequences of a nuclear disaster in Taiwan.

The real cost of generating electricity through atomic energy has long been underestimated, leaving out many costs such as disposal of nuclear waste, which is already a problem with effects that will last for millions of years, she said.

“The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has already cost three times what the average plant does. Doesn’t President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) or any official from the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the National Audit Office or other agencies related to the approval of the budget need to be held responsible for this?” theater and film director Ko Yi-chen (柯一正) asked.

“People have the right to live without fear and to have stability … and opinion polls have shown that up to 70 percent of the public are against the Gongliao plant,” he said, adding that “Ma should do at least one thing right in his reign: abort the project.”

This story has been viewed 1813 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top