Activists opposing media monopolization yesterday urged the National Communications Commission (NCC) to punish Want Want China Times Group’s CtiTV News for what they described as “twisting their statements” on the proposed media anti-monopolization act.
In their petition to the commission, members of 901 Media Anti-Monopoly Alliance and their supporters said the statements they made on the media anti-monopolization act at a press conference on Monday were “maliciously twisted” and turned into a false news report, adding that CtiTV reporters were at the press conference and knew that the alliance opposed the acquisition of media outlets by financial groups.
To prove their point, activists provided transcripts of CtiTV’s news story on the press conference, as well as statements made at the press conference by former Financial Supervisory Commission chairperson Shih Chun-chi (施俊吉), who helped draft the version of the media anti-monopolization act proposed by the activists.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The CtiTV report accused Association of Taiwan Journalists (ATJ) chairwoman Chen Hsiao-yi (陳曉宜), a representative of the alliance, of employing double standards on scrutinizing the Want Want China Times Group and the Liberty Times Group, for which Chen worked as a journalist.
The report said Chen failed to apply the regulation restricting financial institutions’ investment in media outlets retroactively to the Liberty Times Group, which CtiTV said showed that Chen was a “hired thug” of group founder Rong San Lin (林榮三).
In response, Chen demanded that CtiTV make corrections and offer a public apology at the same news hour in the same proportion as the news story, adding that she would take legal action if the TV station refused to do so.
“I have stated many times that the alliance favors prohibiting financial institutions from acquiring media outlets. The regulation should apply to whomever violates the principle. CtiTV knew this all along, but it continued to accuse me of saying the exact opposite,” Chen said. “Not only does the television station abuse the use of a media outlet, but it has also hurt my interests and damaged the reputation of the ATJ. It should be held responsible.”
Asked by CtiTV reporters if the articles barring financial institutions from acquiring media outlets in the media anti-monopolization act should be retroactively applied to the Fubon Group and the Union Group if the act is passed by the legislature, Chen said the station had apparently confused two separate matters.
“The retroactive clause would only apply to past media acquisition cases that cross the ‘red lines’ stated in the proposed media anti-monopolization act... However, regulations banning financial groups from acquiring media outlets apply to all media outlets. These two matters are not related,” Chen said.
“I suggest you [CtiTV] take a look at the proposed act and have legal experts explain it line by line to Tsai if he does not understand it,” Chen said, referring to Want Want China Times Group chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明).
Academia Sinica assistant research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who was falsely accused by CtiTV of paying students to rally against Want Want China Times, said that the incident showed that the TV station has absolutely no remorse over what it is doing.
“CtiTV became what it is today because it is managed by Tsai, who is not qualified to manage the media outlets in the first place,” Huang said. “Tsai, if you really love Taiwan, give journalists and civil society in Taiwan a break. Stop trashing media outlets and democracy in Taiwan with your money.”
National Taiwan University journalism professor Flora Chang (張錦華) said the commission had asked CtiTV to address the problems with the operation of its ethics committee within a designated period at the commission’s biennial evaluation of the channel’s performance in April.
Chang said that the channel may have violated Article 6 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法) because of the incident, which means the commission is entitled to revoke its broadcasting license.
POLAM KOPITIAM CASE: Of the two people still in hospital, one has undergone a liver transplant and is improving, while the other is being evaluated for a liver transplant A fourth person has died from bongkrek acid poisoning linked to the Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) restaurant in Taipei’s Far Eastern Sogo Xinyi A13 Department Store, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said yesterday, as two other people remain seriously ill in hospital. The first death was reported on March 24. The man had been 39 years old and had eaten at the restaurant on March 22. As more cases of suspected food poisoning involving people who had eaten at the restaurant were reported by hospitals on March 26, the ministry and the Taipei Department of Health launched an investigation. The Food and
The long-awaited Taichung aquarium is expected to open next year after more than a decade of development. The building in Cingshui District (清水) is to feature a large ocean aquarium on the first floor, coral display area on the second floor, a jellyfish tank and Dajia River (大甲溪) basin display on the third, a river estuary display and restaurant on the fourth, and a cafe and garden on the fifth. As it is near Wuci Fishing Port (梧棲漁港), many are expecting the opening of the aquarium to bring more tourism to the harbor. Speaking at the city council on Monday, Taichung City Councilor
A fourth person has died in a food poisoning outbreak linked to the Xinyi (信義) branch of Malaysian restaurant chain Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in Taipei, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Victor Wang (王必勝) said on Monday. It was the second fatality in three days, after another was announced on Saturday. The 40-year-old woman experienced multiple organ failure in the early hours on Monday, and the family decided not to undergo emergency resuscitation, Wang said. She initially showed signs of improvement after seeking medical treatment for nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, but her condition worsened due to an infection, he said. Two others who
Taiwanese should be mindful when visiting China, as Beijing in July is likely to tighten the implementation of policies on national security following the introduction of two regulations, a researcher said on Saturday. China on Friday unveiled the regulations governing the law enforcement and judicial activities of national security agencies. They would help crack down on “illegal” and “criminal” activities that Beijing considers to be endangering national security, according to reports by China’s state media. The definition of what constitutes a national security threat in China is vague, Taiwan Thinktank researcher Wu Se-chih (吳瑟致) said. The two procedural regulations are to provide Chinese