A survey of 20 types of eggs sold in stores showed that one type purchased from a supermarket contained florfenicol, which can have negative effects on the liver and kidneys if consumed in large quantities, the Consumers’ Foundation said yesterday.
To cater to the high demand for eggs, many chicken farms choose to keep their hens in battery cages to save space, the foundation said, adding that when large numbers of hens are kept in a small space, the possibility of cross infections increases.
As such, farmers sometimes choose to add drugs to chickenfeed to prevent diseases and in some cases eggs from these hens become contaminated with drug residues, the foundation said.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
In addition to drugs residues, the foundation said microbial egg contamination — such as salmonella infection — is another problem that needs to be examined, so its survey also tested the eggs for salmonella and selenium levels as well as several types of drug residues.
The results showed that one type of eggs contained florfenicol, a type of antibiotic used for the treatment of bovine respiratory disease, which may harm humans and is banned under the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法).
According to the act, the company responsible should inform consumers and have the contaminated products recalled and destroyed, the foundation said.
If they fail to do so, they may face a fine between NT$60,000 (US$2,000) and NT$6 million based on the damages caused, the foundation said, adding that the Department of Health should look into the case.
Results for salmonella infections and other drug residues were all found to be within regulated standards, it said.
The foundation said that although salmonella infection was not discovered in the sampled eggs, consumers should still be aware that egg shells can become contaminated during storage.
Consumers should be careful when choosing eggs and check whether there are cracks in the shell and avoid eating the egg if the yolk contains parts of the chicken, it said, adding that fresh eggs are often heavier and have a thicker shell.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of