Plans announced last week by the Executive Yuan to slash the year-end bonuses for retired civil servants have caused consternation among both serving and retired military personnel, hurting morale and potentially undermining plans to create an all-volunteer force by 2015.
Following an expedited review of the annual year-end bonus for retired civil servants, military personnel and public school teachers, Premier Sean Chen announced a provisional plan to cut the budget for the bonus from NT$19.2 billion (US$656 million) under the current regime to about NT$1 billion.
Under the new regime, which could come into force starting in February next year, retired public servants in only two categories — those receiving a monthly pension of less than NT$20,000 and the families of military personnel who died or were injured in the line of duty — would be entitled to the bonus, or about 42,000 people, from 432,000 at present.
Although most people agree that the current system is unsustainable given the treasury’s financial difficulties, divisions remain on the breadth and scope of the proposed cuts.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has expressed support for the plan, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) maintains that it does not go far enough and has called for even steeper cuts to be implemented immediately.
Both DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) have called for an end to the program.
The reactions among those who risk seeing their year-end bonus become a thing of the past have understandably been negative, but nowhere has it sparked as much anger as within the armed forces.
The sense of resignation has been especially felt among low- to medium-ranking officers, with several expressing their discontent at the Ma government on various Internet platforms. Others seem to be gearing up for street protests.
Describing Chen’s announcement as “a tragic day for families,” one retired navy officer expressed his angst in an online post.
“I was born into a military family. As a father of four children, I have been raising them with my pensions ever since my retirement from the navy,” the retired officer said.
“However, on this ‘memorable day’ [of the announcement] all I could say to my eldest daughter, who is still a second-grade senior-high-school student, was that our family’s rightfully deserved pension bonuses have been confiscated by the government and that her father could no longer afford to hand out red envelopes or buy them new clothes on Lunar New Year,” he said.
The officer said that while most military officers had sacrificed most of their youth serving the country, they have now been cast aside by unworthy politicians like “used diapers or sanitary napkins” after their retirement.
“Worst of all, President Ma even lauded the benefits of such reforms,” he wrote. “My apologies to Chinese Nationalist party (KMT) city and county councilors, who may find themselves losing at least two to three votes [from my family members] and perhaps getting a few more invalid ballots in the next elections.”
Dozens of similar messages have been posted on the Web since the announcement was made.
Fueling the consternation is the unfair manner in which the military have been lumped together with other public servants. Unlike government workers or teachers, military personnel spend a great part of their career serving away from home.
As a consequence their spouses can rarely find work, which reduces the total family income. Members of the armed forces also do not receive overtime pay, while the risks of injury or death are much higher than in other sectors.
In addition, active and retired generals receive a much greater share of the total salaries and year-end bonuses than do lower-ranking personnel, a situation that some observers say is unfair to mid-career officers who struggle to raise their families, pay their mortgage and put their children through school, and for whom the year-end red envelope was a welcome addition.
Beyond the immediate anger among recently retired officers, the planned cuts risk having serious repercussions on morale among active troops and the ability of the armed forces to attract recruits for an all-volunteer force amid a program to end military conscription by 2015.
Anger at low salaries and perceived disregard for the welfare of military officers also creates opportunities for recruitment by foreign intelligence agents, thus undermining national security.
Contacted for comment, Ministry of National Defense spokesman David Lo (羅紹和) said that plans to cut the year-end bonuses should be carried out in a reasonable and objective fashion.
“We should not let emotional and irrational attacks demoralize the people serving in our military, civil, and educational system and sow discord within society,” Lo said.
In light of the soon-to-be implemented volunteer military system, both ruling and opposition parties, as well as society as a whole, must make the long term benefits of the nation the top priority.
“We have to seriously consider what wages are within reason while making sure they are alluring enough for men to voluntarily sign up for the military,” Lo said.
Meanwhile, discontent within the ranks over the planned cuts, added to Ma’s failure to provide any words of comfort to the military, have created what a former National Security Council official called a “golden opportunity” for the DPP, which has long had tenuous relations with the brass, to “win friends” in the military. Whether the party will seize that opportunity remains to be seen.
Contacted yesterday, the office of DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), who sits on the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, would not comment on the projected cuts because the plan is still under review in the legislature.
Additional reporting by Stacy Hsu and Jake Chung
Taiwan might be China’s next target after it has “walled off” Hong Kong from the rest of the world with its new national security legislation, Academia Sinica Institute of Sociology fellow Wu Jieh-min (吳介民) said on Thursday. At a seminar organized by the Economic Democracy Union, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, the Hong Kong Outlanders and the Judicial Reform Foundation, Wu said that the legislation is simultaneously a fig leaf concealing Beijing’s autocratic rule in Hong Kong and a figurative “Berlin Wall,” denying democratic countries access to Hong Kong. Wu said it is evident that Taiwan would be China’s next target. The
SAFETY CONCERNS: A construction company working nearby admitted to negligence in the incident, and is to pay a fine and other expenses related to damages Residents of homes adjacent to an alleyway in New Taipei City’s Yonghe District (永和) on Saturday were forced to evacuate their homes after the road collapsed, the New Taipei City government said yesterday. An 80m by 4m area in an alleyway on Wenhua Road (文化路) collapsed at 10:39am near an apartment building construction site where work was being done on the project’s foundation. The incident also ruptured an underground gas pipe and tilted several buildings in the area. Residents would not be able to return to their homes until tomorrow or Wednesday, when repairs are expected to be finished, the city government said. Workers
CHALLENGER DEEP: Lin Ying-Tsong was invited by Caladan Oceanic founder Victor Vescovo to join him on a 10-hour long trip in the company’s submersible Taiwanese-American Lin Ying-Tsong (林穎聰) last month became the first person from Asia and the 12th in human history to dive into the deepest part on Earth, the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench. Lin, 45, an expert in deep sea acoustics with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Massachusetts, joined US adventurer and Caladan Oceanic founder Victor Vescovo, 54, on June 22 in a descent to the central pool of the Challenger Deep, the deepest point of the trench, which lies at a depth of more than 10,900m. The pair made the descent in a submersible named Limiting Factor, a US$37
ARMS RACE: Two DPP lawmakers said that China’s development model differed from Taiwan’s, as it aims to become a global hegemon, while Taiwan seeks to protect itself Taiwanese national defense experts are split on how Taiwan should respond to the ever-growing budget of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with some advocating for Taiwan to increase defense spending, while others say that little can be done. The Legislative Yuan approved NT$358 billion (US$12.1 billion) for national defense spending across fiscal 2020, a 3.47 percent increase compared with last year, while China’s military budget this year is NT$5.4 trillion, more than 15 times that of Taiwan. Regardless of whether the government adopts a zero-based budgeting method for national defense spending — in which all expenses are justified and approved each