Former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) said he opposed the appointment of former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) to head the party’s planned China Affairs Committee being mulled by DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
To consolidate and integrate the party’s policies on China, Su is said to be planning to designate Hsieh as head of the reinstated committee.
“I am quite concerned with Hsieh’s stance on China. Hsieh’s proposal for a 'constitutional one China (憲法一中)' is contrary to the DPP’s platform on Taiwanese sovereignty,” he said. “What would the committee do? Would it have an advisory role, or have policy decisionmaking functions? This must be clearly delineated, because the DPP already has decisionmaking bodies in the Central Executive Committee and the Central Standing Committee.”
Former premier and former DPP chairman Yu Shyi-kun also questioned the move.
“We already have the Department of China Affairs, so why do we need a China Affairs Committee?” he asked.
In response, DPP spokesperson Wang Min-sheng (王閔生) said this was an ongoing matter.
“As of yet, we do not have a timetable on the starting date of the committee. We understand there are different opinions inside the party. The party executives will take time with due consideration on this matter. We will inform everyone when progress has been made,” Wang said.
A top DPP executive said Su had already decided to put Hsieh in charge of the committee. In response to media inquiries, Wang said no decision had been made.
According to an official from a pro-localization group, members of some pro-localization groups discussed the issue of the DPP’s plans to reinstate the committee, and a number of officials had reservations about the move.
Some, remembering Hsieh’s "one country, two cities (一國兩市)" initiative in 2000, were apprehensive about his stance on China, the official said, adding that they remain wary of Hsieh’s overall views on cross-strait relations, despite supporting his resistance to the so-called “1992 consensus” during his visit to China last week.
Hsieh returned earlier this week from a five-day visit to China to mixed reviews and criticism from the pan-green camp, after he became the most senior member of the DPP to meet with high-ranking Chinese officials.
Hsieh sought to set people’s minds at ease in a post on Web site Plurk yesterday.
“Freedom, democracy and human rights are the fruits of Taiwan’s democracy movement these past 30 years. Most of these core values are documented in the Constitution,” he wrote. “To me, aside from the difference of constitutional order between 'constitutions with different interpretations (憲法各表)' and ‘one China, with each side having its own interpretation (一中各表)' .... there are also differences in our emotional response to it.”
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all