A husband’s appeal for divorce over his wife’s seemingly random but pervasive purchasing habits was granted by the Taichung branch of the High Court earlier last month.The court added that the marriage was defunct after a separation of 10 years.
The husband, surnamed Liu (劉), and his wife, surnamed Lin (林), were married 26 years ago, and since the wedding Lin had not taken a job, leaving Liu to support the family.
A decade ago, Lin began to develop odd purchasing habits, frequently buying large quantities of soap and toothpaste, throwing them on the floor and then buying the same products again, the court heard.
Unable to stand her seemingly random habits, Liu lived separately from Lin since 2002.
However, dissatisfied with Liu’s decision to live separately, Lin frequently harassed him, either by going to his residence and making a scene or calling him repeatedly, the court heard.
Growing increasingly exasperated by her behavior, Liu filed for divorce with the court, and after reviewing the case, the Taichung District Court approved his request.
Lin appealed the ruling, claiming that although she did not have any kind of psychiatric disorder, she had been seeing a doctor and was cured of her habits, adding that she did not purchase the large quantities of household goods for no reason.
When the High Court reviewed the case, it sent for the couple’s son to make a witness statement.
According to the son, Lin often bought items that were never used, citing for example that she had accumulated over 20 boxes of clothing, wigs and other miscellaneous items in the past decade.
“I’m of the opinion that my parents should be divorced and I am willing to provide for the basic expenses of my mother,” the son was quoted as saying.
On July 17, the High Court ruled that as Liu and his wife had been living separately for 10 years, the marriage was defunct and that both sides had contributed to the break-up of the marriage.
The ruling said Liu had not actively encouraged his wife to pursue medical or psychiatric treatment after discovering her symptoms and that Lin herself had contributed to the break-up of the marriage by verbally abusing and harassing her husband.
The High Court ruling sustained that of the district court, approving Liu’s appeal for divorce.
Commenting on the case, Hsu Ching-chi (許景琦), the superintendent of Wizcare Hospital, a facility specializing in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and mental illnesses, said Lin’s odd shopping habits indicated a personality disorder that might have started before she was 18 years old.
The disorder could stem from financial hardship during her youth, which caused her to feel insecure when she was not able to buy things, Hsu said.
This type of personality disorder must have existed before her marriage to Liu, and as Lin became increasingly impulsive, she would not have been able to keep her disorder in check, Hsu said, adding that Liu only found out about her habits during their marriage because she might have been able to restrain her actions before the couple got married or because she felt more at ease spending money that she had not herself earned.
It is impossible for the symptoms to only have developed during the marriage, Hsu said, adding that the treatment of the disorder would involve both medication and long-term, in-depth psychiatric therapy.
Doctor Hsu Hung-ming (徐宏銘) of the Shin Ching Clinic said Lin’s purchasing habits might be a symptom of a manic depressive disorder whereby the afflicted person may at any given time feel the need to go on a purchasing spree, during several months in a year or after a certain amount of time has elapsed, Hsu Hung-ming said, adding that if family members criticize the purchasing spree the patient may become confrontational toward them.
However, Hsu Hung-ming also said that while manic depressive disorders can be brought under control or cured with medication, continuous compulsive buying over a period of 10 years might be an indication of a compulsive-obsessive purchasing disorder that stems from problems with social interaction.
It could be that Lin does not get along well with others or has problems getting along with her husband and sees buying items as a way to express negative emotions, Hsu Hung-ming said.
This kind of disorder is about human interaction and can not be cured with just medication, Hsu Hung-ming said, adding that in addition to taking medication, Lin should undergo psychiatric therapy.
Lin Pen-tang (林本堂), a doctor at the Taichung Veteran’s General Hospital, said Lin’s actions exhibit partial symptoms of impulsive purchasing, indicating that she is a shopaholic and exhibits symptoms of manic depressive disorder.
Long-term therapy is needed to find the root cause, Lin Pen-tang said, adding that some psychiatric disorders do not manifest themselves until a patient is 20 or 30 years old and that the patient should have sought medical help as soon as the symptoms started to manifest themselves.
Actor Darren Wang (王大陸) was sentenced to six months in prison, commutable to a fine, by the New Taipei District Court today for contravening the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法) in a case linked to an alleged draft-dodging scheme. Wang allegedly paid NT$3.6 million (US$114,380) to an illegal group to help him evade mandatory military service through falsified medical documents, prosecutors said. He transferred the funds to Chen Chih-ming (陳志明), the alleged mastermind of a draft-evasion ring, although he lost contact with him as he was already in detention on fraud charges, they said. Chen is accused of helping a
SECURITY: Starlink owner Elon Musk has taken pro-Beijing positions, and allowing pro-China companies to control Taiwan’s critical infrastructure is risky, a legislator said Starlink was reluctant to offer services in Taiwan because of the nation’s extremely high penetration rates in 4G and 5G services, the Ministry of Digital Affairs said yesterday. The ministry made the comments at a meeting of the legislature’s Transportation Committee, which reviewed amendments to Article 36 of the Telecommunications Management Act (電信管理法). Article 36 bans foreigners from holding more than 49 percent of shares in public telecommunications networks, while shares foreigners directly and indirectly hold are also capped at 60 percent of the total, unless specified otherwise by law. The amendments, sponsored by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ko
UNREASONABLE SURVEILLANCE: A camera targeted on an road by a neighbor captured a man’s habitual unsignaled turn into home, netting him dozens of tickets The Taichung High Administrative Court has canceled all 45 tickets given to a man for failing to use a turn signal while driving, as it considered long-term surveillance of his privacy more problematic than the traffic violations. The man, surnamed Tseng (曾), lives in Changhua County and was reported 45 times within a month for failing to signal while driving when he turned into the alley where his residence is. The reports were filed by his neighbor, who set up security cameras that constantly monitored not only the alley but also the door and yard of Tseng’s house. The surveillance occurred from July
‘SAME OLD TRICK’: Even if Beijing resumes individual travel to Taiwan, it would only benefit Chinese tourism companies, the Economic Democracy Union convener said China’s 10 new “incentives” are “sugar-coated poison,” an official said yesterday, adding that Taiwanese businesses see them clearly for what they are, but that Beijing would inevitably find some local collaborators to try to drums up support. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, made the remark ahead of a news conference the General Chamber of Commerce is to hold today. The event, titled “Industry Perspectives on China’s Recent Pro-Taiwan Policies,” is expected to include representatives from industry associations — such as those in travel, hotels, food and agriculture — to request the government cooperate with China’s new measures, people familiar with
RSS