Citizen’s Congress Watch (CCW) yesterday said President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — who doubles as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman — was responsible for the paralysis in the Legislative Yuan, urging the ruling party to put aside the controversial beef amendment to allow other bills to be reviewed.
Since Monday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union legislators have filibustered the legislative session in a bid to prevent the KMT from passing amendments to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) that would allow US beef containing residues of the leanness enhancing livestock feed additive ractopamine into Taiwan.
While KMT lawmakers have condemned the opposition parties for stalling the legislature, CCW said it was the KMT — more specifically Ma — who should be held responsible.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
“Since the beginning of the legislative session [in February], only 11 bills have been passed, making this session one of the least productive in Taiwan’s history,” CCW executive director Chang Hung-lin (張宏林) told a news conference. “One of the reasons is that Ma is trying to push through too many controversial bills — such as increasing utility prices and lifting the ban on US beef imports [with ractopamine residues] — after winning his re-election to the presidency in January.”
He said that according to opinion polls, as many as 60 percent of the public are worried about the health threat that ractopamine poses, and some KMT lawmakers have also expressed such worries, though they have been ordered by Ma to support the relaxation of the ban in the legislature.
“The regular session ends [yesterday], but there may be provisional legislative sessions,” Chang said. “The CCW urges lawmakers to put aside controversial bills, and look at other bills first in the extraordinary session.”
On the KMT’s criticism that the DPP is wasting taxpayers’ money by stalling the bills, Chang said that filibustering legislative meetings is a way to protest controversial issues when the ruling party holds a majority.
“Filibustering is a tactic practiced in many other countries. I don’t think it’s inappropriate unless violent means are used,” Chang said.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been pushing the bill on the grounds that allowing the imports is key to resuming important trade talks with the US and ensuring that Taiwan remains competitive.
Because some KMT lawmakers are calling on the government to relax the ban on ractopamine through an executive order, the Homemakers’ United Foundation secretary-general Lu Mei-luan (呂美鸞) reminded the government to follow the proper procedure stipulated in the Executive Procedures Act (行政程序法).
“An executive order is not something that the executive branch of the government can produce whenever it likes,” she said.
“According to the law, there is a procedure to follow, the government should explain to the public why and what it wants to achieve through the executive order, and organize public hearings so that people can express different opinions,” she said.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their