Environmental activists and lawmakers across party lines yesterday urged the Taitung County Government to stop the environmental impact assessment (EIA) on the Miramar Resort, scheduled to take place today, and called on it to demolish the resort building, which has already been declared illegal by the Supreme Administrative Court in Kaohsiung in February.
“It’s so ridiculous that the Taitung County Government wants to hold an EIA meeting to review the Miramar Resort building project, because an EIA meeting is supposed to take place before a project starts, but the building is already there,” Liu Chiung-hsi (劉炯錫), head of Taiwan Environmental Protection Union’s Taitung Office, told a press conference at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. “In addition, the project’s approval from its previous EIA as well as its building permit have both been revoked by various courts, so this building is illegal and it should be demolished before a new EIA is conducted.”
The Miramar Resort building project — located on a beach in Taitung County’s Beinan Township (卑南) — has been a highly controversial project since it began in 2004.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
The Miramar Group began constructing the resort in October 2005 after being granted a construction permit by the county government.
Although the entire resort — including the hotel building and other facilities — occupies an area of 59,956m2, the county government had initially allowed the Miramar Group to divide the project site into different areas, so that no single area is more than 1 hectare because the law requires any construction project over that size to go through an EIA process.
However, in 2007, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) disagreed with the division, ruled that an EIA had to be conducted and that the already-started construction was illegal and that it had to be stopped until it received approval from an EIA.
Several court rulings following the EPA announcement revoked Miramar’s construction permit and EIA result, and ruled that the county government should order a stop to the construction. However, the construction continued because the county government argued that the permit was still valid until a final court ruling was handed down.
However, when the final court ruling to revoke the EIA result for the project and declare the building illegal was handed down by the Supreme Administrative Court in February, construction still continued and the county government said the project had been declared illegal due to “procedural issues.”
To resolve these “procedural issues,” the county government decided to conduct another EIA today, for a building project that has already been completed.
“I can guarantee you that the Miramar Resort will pass the EIA tomorrow [Saturday],” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Wen-yen (邱文彥) said. “It’s so obvious that the county government sides with the Miramar Group, otherwise, why would it be in such a hurry to hold an EIA meeting on Saturday, which is a holiday?”
He said that since the Miramar Resort is located within a traditional Amis area, “the local Amis tribe should be consulted, as stipulated by the Aboriginal Basic Act [原住民族基本法] .”
“I’m not against developments in Taitung, but they should be sustainable ones,” he said. “The development of Taitung should be based on respecting history, culture, ecology and the environment.”
Citizens of the Earth Taiwan board member Thomas Chan (詹順貴), who is also an attorney, questioned the validity of the EIA meeting today.
“The scale and facility of the Miramar Resort has met the criteria for an ‘international tourism hotel’ provided by law, and hence, it falls under the jurisdiction of the central government, and the EIA for it should be conducted by the EPA, not by the local government,” he said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Shu-fen (林淑芬), said it is ridiculous that an EIA is to be conducted for a project that has been completed.
“The Miramar Group certainly does not respect the law at all,” she said. “We should boycott a corporation that behaves like that.”
DPP legislators Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) and Liu Chao-hao (劉櫂豪) of Taitung County, KMT Legislator Liao Kuo-tung (廖國棟) of the Amis tribe and People First Party Legislator Chang Show-foong (張曉風) also attended the news conference to show their support.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
RSS