Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators attending the World Health Assembly’s annual summit in Geneva yesterday criticized references by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to “one country, two areas” (一國兩區) made during his inaugural address on Sunday and said Taiwan should be able to join the WHO under its own name.
The Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Geneva held a cocktail party in honor of Ma’s inauguration that was attended by the ministers of health from at least 12 countries with which Taiwan has diplomatic ties.
During the party, TSU Legislator Lin Shih-chia (林世嘉) thanked the representatives for their nations’ longtime support of Taiwan and expressed Taiwan’s willingness to bolster global health improvement initiatives.
Photo: CNA
“I wish to remind everyone that Taiwan is not a part of China; Taiwan is Taiwan, it is not China. According to UN Resolution 2758 of 1971, Beijing is the only legal representative of China in the UN; there is no “one country, two areas,” she said in her speech.
“Taiwan is a sovereign, independent country, and the only way to join the WHO is to join under the name of Taiwan, and I think all here agree with me,” she said.
KMT Legislator Su Ching-chuan (蘇清泉) confirmed his support for the idea, saying that while he and Lin were from different political parties, “we share the same opinion” on the issue, adding a call for all diplomatic allies present to continue to support Taiwan’s endeavors to not only join the WHO as a full member, but also participate more dynamically in international organizations.
The speech elicited a frank statement from the minister of health from the Republic of Nauru, who said that although his comment was likely to “offend” some people, the truth is that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent country and should therefore be able to participate in the WHO as a full member.
Meanwhile, in an international telephone interview, Lin told reporters from Taiwan that Ma’s mention of “one country, two areas” in his inaugural address and definition of “one China,” the Republic of China (ROC), was not only not recognized in international diplomatic circles, but would also ensure that Taiwan would never be able to join the WHO or the UN.
Instead, comments like that would only let the international community mistakenly think that the Taiwanese government accepts China’s “one China” framework and that Taiwan is only an area under China, Lin said.
She added that such misconceptions would only undermine Taiwan’s claims of sovereignty and lessen the opportunities in which Taiwan can participate in the international community.
Lin said that it was only by focusing on its objective of joining the WHO and the UN as a member state that the name of Taiwan and its sovereignty would be safeguarded.
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their