Liberty Times: The Council of Agriculture (COA), after chairing the inter-departmental meeting, is alleged to have made an arbitrary statement that ractopamine-based Paylean differs from commonly known lean meat essences. Is Paylean not a kind of lean meat additive?
Lin Chieh-liang (林杰樑): Paylean is definitely a lean meat additive. The effects of the additive are exactly the same as that of other lean-meat promoting drugs, which are to increase lean meat in cattle and pigs and to decrease the amount of excrement to lower overhead costs and maximize economic value. Nobody in the entire world would deny that fact.
While low in toxicity in comparison with clenbuterol and salbutamol, Paylean cannot be said to be completely non-toxic. If [Paylean] is as safe as the government says it is, why is it that only 27 nations, and most of them exporters of farm animals, in the whole world dare use it? [The only explanation] is that its safety [of usage] is still doubted internationally.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Because Paylean causes animals to grow lean meat unnaturally, it must have adverse side-effects. It is possible that it would cause palpitations or induce side-effects including cardiovascular diseases. People with cardiovascular diseases do not even have to ingest a lot of it to be poisoned; [all it takes] is for their heartbeat to accelerate to higher than 100 beats per minute — from the normal 70 to 90 beats per minute — for symptoms to begin to show, or even become fatal.
Currently, 29 countries in the world have clear laws prohibiting the use of Paylean, while other nations, such as Singapore, do not allow the import or use of the additive. These countries have further said that they would only consider importing and using the additive if the WHO or the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) has certified its safety.
LT: Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) and other high-level officials have all been saying that no research has ever showed that anyone has been poisoned by ingesting Paylean-laced meat. It seems that [they are implying] Paylean is safe.
Lin: The EU’s European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) released complete and in-depth scientific evaluation reports on Paylean in 2009.
These reports were based on documents and research reports that the US offered to the WHO on the use of Paylean in the US and it also included research — which the EFSA doubted very much — cited by our government officials, saying that six subject cases did not exhibit Paylean-poisoning symptoms.
The EFSA report said that the US’ data, with most of the statistics based on animal test subjects, had a credibility issue. It added that, for safety reasons, evaluations should also be done of human test subjects.
The EFSA also cast doubts on the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) standard of 1 microgram of Paylean per person, based on a study of six test subjects that ingested 5 milligrams of Paylean each, saying that not enough people have been tested to form a basis for setting a standard.
The EFSA further said that of the six test subjects, one had backed out of the experiment after experiencing palpitations upon ingesting Paylean, showing the report lacked credibility.
The EFSA also questioned why the FDA had given the test subjects a lower dosage to determine Paylean’s effects, adding that all six subjects had clean bills of health. The FDA study did not even evaluate high-risk groups with cardiovascular diseases, the EFSA said, adding that the US report would not be able to predict the safety of high-risk groups.
Premier Chen and the COA minister kept emphasizing that there were no scientific reports of cases of Paylean poisoning. While they are certainly right, therein lies the problem — the lack of research into how Paylean affects the human body causes [public] worries.
Besides, there are a lot of high-risk groups who face risks to their health by the side-effects of drugs that speed up heartbeat rates.
The EU has since 2009 asked the US to provide more proof based on further tests on human subjects, especially on the epidemiology for high-risk groups, but because the US has so far not complied, the EU has kept Paylean on its prohibited list.
LT: The governmental health organizations had already in 2007 drafted an act tolerating a certain level of residual Paylean. Would such a measure ensure the safety of people ingesting US beef?
Lin: Neither the US’ suggestion of 1 microgram ADI, nor the Japanese standard of 10ppb (parts per billion) to 90ppb of residual Paylean in meats or intestines, correspond with the eating habits of Taiwanese.
The Americans focus mainly on the [consumption of] meat and the Japanese do not eat intestines, but Taiwanese eat almost everything. With the concentration of residual drugs higher in the intestines — at least five to ten times the amount found in meat — the danger [posed to people] is also that much higher.
Medical research in the past has by and large focused on the concentration of residuals in the livers and kidneys, but last year China announced research results according to which the lungs of cows also accumulate a high concentration of Paylean. This led China to tell the WHO that Paylean should be forbidden [in China], because the Chinese also eat the intestines and lungs of cows. This is the reason China forbids the importing of US beef.
In the same vein, Taiwanese also frequently eat intestines. For example, a lactating mother, in the month after giving birth, would almost on a daily basis eat kidneys and [intestines.]
According to an investigation by the Department of Health several years ago, pregnant women eat 360g of pig livers, 130g of pig kidneys and 92g of meat [during the month after giving birth], which would equal ingesting 27 micrograms of Paylean per day.
While these are average rates [gleaned from] old data and [taking into account that] there are those who do not eat meat at all, some people eat a lot of meat at one sitting. Clinically, I’ve seen cases where people ate at least 600g of meat every day.
Added to that, people now like to go to buffet-style barbeque restaurants, so it has become easy to eat too much meat and intestines every day.
The EU also said the risk evaluation and measuring of Paylean should not only be focused on the “actual Paylean concentration,” but the concentration of its metabolic intermediates, ie, its half-metabolized products, should also be measured.
Although the current examination does not test the metabolic intermediates like it does Paylean itself, the risk such amalgamates pose to the health of humans or animals is the same, and it should also be listed within the measurements [of potential harm to the human body].
Besides, feed additives for most pigs and cows on the final drive to the slaughterhouse are usually left out for a certain amount of time, so they would leave no residuals.
However, the use of Paylean is not stopped, even on the day of slaughter, and the chemical properties of Paylean are not damaged [or altered] even if the meat is cooked or boiled.
Part two of this interview will be published tomorrow.
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
A year-long renovation of Taipei’s Bangka Park (艋舺公園) began yesterday, as city workers fenced off the site and cleared out belongings left by homeless residents who had been living there. Despite protests from displaced residents, a city official defended the government’s relocation efforts, saying transitional housing has been offered. The renovation of the park in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華), near Longshan Temple (龍山寺), began at 9am yesterday, as about 20 homeless people packed their belongings and left after being asked to move by city personnel. Among them was a 90-year-old woman surnamed Wang (王), who last week said that she had no plans
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
RSS