Fri, Nov 04, 2011 - Page 2 News List

Sex workers slam party inaction

SAY ONE THING:The head of the sex workers collective said that even though the KMT and DPP purport to be open and progressive, their behavior says otherwise

By Loa Iok-sin  /  Staff Reporter

Members of the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters perform a skit outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday protesting against proposals they say are unfair to people working in the sex industry.

Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times

The Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (COSWAS) yesterday lashed out at both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), accusing them of reluctance to propose a real solution for sex workers as a clause in the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法) that penalizes sex workers is due to expire.

Declared unconstitutional by the Council of Grand Justices three years ago, a clause in the Social Order Maintenance Act that penalizes sex workers, but not their clients, will expire on Sunday.

The Cabinet has proposed amendments to the law to authorize local governments to create red-light districts where the sex trade is allowed, while it would remain banned outside those areas.

DPP Legislator Huang Sue-ying (黃淑英) also proposed amendments to penalize only the client, not the sex worker.

KMT Legislator Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) has also proposed her own law revision to totally decriminalize the sex trade. However, her proposal has not received much support from colleagues.

“The KMT said that it supports allowing the sex trade to a certain extent with appropriate management, and that’s why the Cabinet has proposed the ‘red-light district’ plan,” COSWAS executive director Chung Chun-chu (鍾君竺) told a press conference held in front of the Legislative Yuan.

“But there’s neither ‘allowing the trade to a certain extent’ nor ‘appropriate management’ in the Cabinet plan — which is supported by most KMT lawmakers — because no local government is willing to -designate red-light districts, and thus it’s a de facto complete ban on the sex trade,” Chung said.

Responding to Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah’s (江宜樺) earlier remarks that the designation of red-light districts “could be discussed later after the law revision is passed,” Chung said: “Well, ‘discussing it later’ doesn’t mean anything for sex workers, because waiting for one more day means that they are not able to work and make a living for an extra day.”

Although DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the DPP caucus have criticized the Cabinet proposal, saying it would not work regardless of whether the law penalizes the prostitute or the client, or allows red-light districts, Chung said that the DPP has also failed to propose any concrete solutions.

“Both parties try to pretend that they’re open-minded and progressive, but what they do is different from what they say,” Chung said.

Although it supported complete decriminalization of the sex industry, Chung said that the COSWAS would be willing to compromise on the red-light district proposal “if a clause is added to the red-light -district deal that local governments should designate red-light districts within six months after the amendment is passed or the sex trade should remain completely legal within cities or counties where the local government fails to do so.”

This story has been viewed 4294 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top