Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) said yesterday that it has not been decided how to exclude the rich from a much--deliberated proposal to raise welfare pensions for senior farmers.
Chen said at a question-and-answer session at the legislature that the council is still considering whether to implement the exclusion based on income or real--estate value.
The proposal by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which has proceeded to a second reading, is for an additional NT$1,000 (US$33) on top of the current pension of NT$6,000 a month for each farmer. The Executive Yuan’s version of the bill was reported to exclude rich farmers.
Legislators from both the ruling and opposition parties questioned Chen on the proposal.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chung Shao-ho (鍾紹和) said he was opposed to the exclusion, arguing that the rich already pay income and luxury taxes.
Civil service pay raises did not consider the government’s finances, so why should it be different when it comes to farmers’ pensions, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) asked.
“The national pension and veterans’ pensions, for example, both exclude the rich. [To exclude] based on income or real-estate value is still under consideration,” Chen said in response to the question.
He also cited a poll that showed 47 percent of farmers were in favor of an exclusion, compared with 33 percent against.
Chen said last week that a decision is expected within a month.
Three KMT lawmakers proposed in the session to lift senior farmers’ pensions from NT$6,000 to NT$8,000 a month. The proposal was later passed.
Former Department of Health minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) accused both the KMT and the DPP of proposing the pension increase to attract votes in January’s elections.
“Where will the money come from? How can political parties only give promises, but not give money and increase the public debt?” he asked in an article he penned to Chinese-language media.
Yaung said the DPP, which has made a campaign ad on the issue, should explain how it would conjure up the NT$8.2 billion extra cost of the subsidy.
“Otherwise, it is an irresponsible party that has proposed an irresponsible act,” he said.
He also said the KMT was no better because it dared not tell the public the truth behind this election promise.
Lin Wan-yi (林萬億), a social work professor at National Taiwan University and a former DPP minister without portfolio, said that Taiwan’s agricultural problems, which include illegal seizures of farmland, imbalance of production and sales, and aging farmers, could not be solved by raising pensions.
He argued that senior farmers should be taken care of financially by a national pension for the elderly, which would be a more sustainable social welfare system.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their
RSS