A “leaked” internal memo from the WHO made public yesterday raised new questions about Taiwan’s participation in the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The memo, handed out by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲), states: “Taiwan, as a province of China, cannot be party to the IHR” — an agreement that dovetails with Beijing’s position.
World Health Assembly (WHA) Resolution 25.1, referring to the 1972 clause that ejected Taiwan’s representatives to the WHO, remains a “touchstone for such matters,” the confidential document said.
Taiwan’s inability to be a party in the IHR is “consistent with that resolution,” it said.
The memo’s assertions come as a direct contradiction to remarks from officials in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, who have hailed Taiwan’s inclusion in the IHR in 2009, when Taiwan was allowed to attend the annual WHA meeting as an observer. The administration insists Taiwan’s admission did not require Beijing’s approval.
Fadela Chaib, a WHO spokesperson who checked with the body’s legal counsel, confirmed to the Taipei Times that Taiwan “is part” of the IHR, but did not expand on the extent of its participation.
Refusing to elaborate on the contradiction with the internal memo, she said that “Taiwan, China” is a part of the globally binding health regulations.
In Taipei, Department of Health (DOH) officials said Taiwan was “without doubt” a participant in the global rules aimed at enhancing public health. Taiwan voluntarily complied with the regulations in 2006 and officially became a party to it in 2009, officials said.
“There’s no question about it. Taiwan has been a participant in the IHR since 2009,” DOH spokesperson Wang Che-chao (王哲超) told the Taipei Times.
Wang said communications between Taipei and the two WHO-appointed “contact points” had been ongoing and contradicted the statement that Taiwan cannot be party to the regulations because of its lack of official statehood.
The statement is included in the memo’s “talking points” WHO officials should use when responding to questions from outside the body about Taiwan’s status based on an arrangement between the WHO and Beijing.
Kuan also said another contentious aspect of Taiwan’s relationship with the WHO was an IHR expert roster that listed a former DOH deputy chief as from “Taiwan, China.”
The document, released separately by Kuan’s office, is consistent with the first memo that dictates the proper terminology for Taiwan as “the Taiwan Province of China.”
Dated Jan. 15, the roster singles out former DOH deputy minister Chang Shan-chwen (張上淳).
“Our representatives apparently have to attend [WHO] expert sessions under the designation from [China] and Chang is no different,” Kuan said in remarks that Chang immediately rejected.
Chang, who had stepped down from the post when the roster was published, said yesterday he had heard that a Taiwanese expert encountered the problem earlier this year, but said that it was not he.
“If something like this did happen, I would never have participated in the [WHO],” he said, insisting that he was called “Dr Chang” at all times during the IHR expert sessions.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all